Midterm outcomes of autologous bridging of rotator cuff tears with an autologous tendon patch (TEAR patch).

Background: Large and massive rotator cuff tears and tears after failed surgical repair are a challenging clinical problem with different treatment options. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the midterm outcomes after rotator cuff repair (RCR) with autologous hamstring tendon graft bridging (tissue-enhanced autologous rotator cuff repair [TEAR] patch) with the hypothesis that outcomes would be reasonable and complication rates would be low.

Methods: This is a retrospective case series study of patients who underwent open RCR using a TEAR patch from June 2015 to March 2019. The exclusion criteria included evidence of cuff tear arthropathy, advanced fatty infiltration, moderate-to-severe arthropathy, and workers compensation board or litigation involved. Clinical outcome measures were Constant score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; Simple Shoulder Test; Subjective Shoulder Value; range of motion (ROM); and manual muscle test for forward elevation, abduction, external and internal rotation, patient satisfaction, and willingness to perform the operation again. Radiographic outcome measures were magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, and radiographs: graft integrity and acromiohumeral distance (AHD).

Results: A total of 44 patients were followed (89%) for ≥2 years (45 shoulders, mean age 60.3 years [48-76 years], mean follow-up 4.3 years [2-6 years]). All clinical outcome measures (Constant score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, Simple Shoulder Test, Subjective Shoulder Value, ROM, and manual muscle test) demonstrated significant improvement except active external and internal rotation. At 2 years of follow-up, the mean patient satisfaction was high (12.2 of 15 points), and 33 of 38 patients (73.3%) would perform the operation again. A perfect graft integration was observed in 30 (66.7%), a small gap in 7 (15.6%), a retear in 3 (7%), and a complete failure of the tendon patch in 5 (11%) patients. Graft integrity was strongly correlated with the postoperative AHD (r = 0.599, P = .001) and the gain in AHD (r = 0.599, P = .001) but not with ROM or patient-reported outcome measures or patient satisfaction. Four patients required revision surgeries (3 due to deep infection and 1 for poor function and pain).

Conclusions: Midterm clinical and radiographic outcomes after RCR with graft bridging using a TEAR patch were reasonable. The procedure resulted in improved shoulder function and a high level of patient satisfaction. The revision rate is acceptable in view of the specific patient group and treatment alternatives. The described technique of the TEAR patch can be a valuable alternative to existing methods and a new autograft source for rotator cuff surgeries that need bridging of a tendon defect.