The rate of force relaxation scaling factor is highly sensitive to detect upper and lower extremity motor deficiencies in mildly affected people with multiple sclerosis.

Background: The motor symptoms affecting upper and lower extremity functioning in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) are considered the cardinal symptoms of multiple sclerosis. There is still a need for outcome measures that can sensitively evaluate these symptoms. We aimed to investigate the sensitivity of the isometric outcomes (maximum force; Fmax, maximum rate of force development; RFDmax, rate of force development scaling factor; RFD-SF, and rate of force relaxation scaling factor; RFR-SF) and standard clinical tests (9-hole peg test; 9HPT and timed 25-feet walk test; T25FW) in detecting the upper and lower extremity motor deficiencies in PwMS and also in a subgroup of mildly affected PwMS whose performance in standard clinical tests were similar to controls.

Methods: Twenty-nine PwMS (age: 47.9 (8.6) years, relapsing-remitting type, expanded disability status scale: 2.5 (1.5)) and their age- and gender-matched controls completed an identical testing protocol in the upper (grip force muscles) and lower (knee extensors) extremities. For each extremity, we assessed Fmax, RFDmax, RFD-SF, and RFR-SF. Additionally, participants completed standard clinical tests for the evaluation of upper- (9HPT) and lower-extremity (T25FW) function. Comparisons were made between controls and PwMS 1) using all study participants and 2) including only mildly affected PwMS whose performance in standard functional tests was comparable to controls. Independent sample t-tests were utilized to compare groups, with a p-value set at 0.01 to correct for multiple comparisons. P-values and effect sizes were used to evaluate the sensitivity of the outcome measures in detecting group differences.

Results: Our results indicate that most isometric outcomes and standard functional tests were sensitive in detecting motor deficiencies in both upper and lower extremities between groups (p<0.001). Among participants, 16 PwMS in 9HPT and 11 PwMS in T25FW demonstrated performance similar to that of the control group (9HPT: 18.85 (2.20) s vs 17.81 (2.19) s; p=0.19) and (T25FW: 3.60 (0.42) s vs 3.58 (0.29) s; p=0.92). The results of the comparisons between mildly affected PwMS and their controls indicate that RFR-SF is the only sensitive isometric outcome to detect differences between groups in the upper (-8.24 (0.76) 1/s vs -8.93 (0.6) 1/s; p=0.008) and lower extremity (-5.86 (1.13) 1/s vs -7.71 (1.11) 1/s; p<0.001).

Conclusion: The rate of force relaxation scaling factor, which assesses the ability to rapidly relax muscle forces after quick contractions, demonstrates high sensitivity in detecting motor deficiencies in PwMS, even when the current standard clinical outcomes fail to detect these differences. Our findings emphasize the importance of future randomized controlled trials focusing on rehabilitative and therapeutic interventions that specifically target muscle force relaxation to enhance motor functioning in PwMS.