Objective: To use a standardised e-cigarette tax measure to examine the impact of e-cigarette taxes on the price and sales of e-cigarettes and cigarettes in the USA.

Design: We used State Line versions of NielsenIQ Retail Scanner data from quarter 4 of 2014 through quarter 4 of 2019 to calculate e-cigarette and cigarette prices and sales in 23 US states. We then estimated how these outcomes are associated with standardised state-level e-cigarette taxes, controlling for state fixed effects, quarter-by-year fixed effects, cigarette taxes, other tobacco control policies and other state-level time-varying characteristics.

Results: A real $1 increase in the e-cigarette standardised tax increases the price of 1 mL of e-liquid between $0.43 and $0.59 depending on specification. Controlling for fixed effects and cigarette taxes, a 10% increase in e-cigarette taxes is estimated to reduce e-cigarette sales by 0.5% and increase cigarette sales by 0.1%, though both results are attenuated and statistically insignificant in a model with full controls.

Conclusions: Our study finds that e-cigarette taxes increase e-cigarette retail prices by approximately half of the tax. Further, e-cigarette taxes are associated with reduced sales of e-cigarettes and increased sales of cigarettes in some specifications. Our estimates are sizably lower than from other studies using sales and survey data.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11478753PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tc-2022-057743DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

e-cigarette taxes
24
e-cigarette
12
fixed effects
12
increase e-cigarette
12
e-cigarette cigarette
8
retail prices
8
sales
8
prices sales
8
sales e-cigarettes
8
effects cigarette
8

Similar Publications

Background: Receipt of cigarette and e-cigarette coupons predicts initiation and progression of use and hinders cessation. Less is known about how coupons operate in different tobacco regulatory environments. The current study utilized longitudinal data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study to address this research gap.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The effect of smokeless tobacco (SLT) excise taxes on SLT use among youth.

Int J Drug Policy

January 2025

Center for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, United States; Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Oncology Division, The Ohio State University, United States.

Background: Smokeless Tobacco (SLT) use prevalence among youth in the United States (US) is comparable to youth prevalence of cigarette smoking. However, it is in general understudied compared to cigarettes and draws less attention nowadays compared to e-cigarettes (ECs).

Aim: We estimate the own- and cross-tax elasticities of SLT use among US youth and explicitly test how SLT use changes in response to taxes on SLT, cigarettes, ECs, and beer.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Tax Incidence and Tax Pass-Through of Smokeless Tobacco in the US.

Int J Environ Res Public Health

November 2024

Center for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 3650 Olentangy River Rd, Columbus, OH 43214, USA.

Background: States adopt different tax bases for smokeless tobacco (SLT), making tax incidence on SLT not directly comparable across states. In addition, how taxes are passed through to SLT prices among states that impose specific taxes, and whether the pass-through rates for SLT are affected by the uptake and evolution of e-cigarettes, is unknown.

Objective: This study will calculate the tax incidence on SLT and investigate how SLT taxes are passed to prices at the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile levels, as well as whether these pass-through rates vary by e-cigarette uptake and evolution.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: 30 states enacted e-cigarette taxes by the end of 2023. E-cigarette tax schema in the USA vary, in contrast to cigarette taxes that are standardised as an excise tax amount per pack. Some states use excise taxes on liquid and containers, others wholesale sales taxes and others retail sales taxes.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Recreational cannabis excise taxation in the USA: Constructing a comparable tax measure for empirical analysis.

Int J Drug Policy

December 2024

Center for Tobacco Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 3650 Olentangy River Road (Suite 110), Columbus, OH 43214, USA; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 1800 Cannon Drive (1335 Lincoln Tower), Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

Background: As of August 2023, 20 states in the US have established recreational cannabis retail markets and impose excise taxes on these products. However, there is significant heterogeneity in the bases (i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!