Payment for Environmental Services: A critical review of schemes, concepts, and practice in Brazil.

Sci Total Environ

Faculty of Agrarian and Veterinary Sciences (FCAV), State University of São Paulo (UNESP), Via Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane, s/n, Jaboticabal, SP 14884-900, Brazil; CQVR-Chemistry Research Centre, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Quinta de Prados Ap. 1013, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal. Electronic address:

Published: November 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examines Payment for Environmental Services (PES) schemes in Brazil, highlighting the lack of clear definitions and consensus on ecosystem services among various research efforts.
  • Approximately one-third of the PES schemes reviewed failed to specify which services were eligible for payment, with a significant focus on carbon and water in the Amazon and Atlantic Forest biomes.
  • The authors argue for standardizing terminology using the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES), as clarity is essential for effective public policy and the overall success of PES initiatives in Brazil.

Article Abstract

The Payment for Environmental Services (PES) is often conceived through complex schemes without a clear definition of all concepts involved. This study presents the results of a systematic literature review on PES schemes in Brazil, accompanied by a critical assessment of their efficacy for potential environmental gains. The PES approaches were grouped into six categories based on the research focus, and those that were focused on PES policies were identified as the most studied. A particular emphasis has been given to the Amazon and Atlantic Forest biomes, where the ecosystem services studied were mostly centered on issues related to carbon and water, respectively. Approximately one-third of all schemes provided no clear definition of which ecosystem services are proposed for payment. In addition, the review showed no consensus among studies on the definition of services in similar schemes. Most schemes presented no payment system conditioned on the provision of environmental services. Furthermore, the review showed that the absence of clarity in the application of concepts may hinder the development of public policies to properly implement PES in Brazil. The conclusion is that standardizing terms used in the literature and in PES schemes is critical; therefore, the use of the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) as a reference is recommended to ensure clarity, objectivity and, more importantly, the expected environmental efficacy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165639DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

environmental services
12
ecosystem services
12
payment environmental
8
clear definition
8
pes schemes
8
services
7
schemes
7
pes
6
payment
4
services critical
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!