Background: Prophylactic use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) mainly depends on left ventricular (LV) systolic function. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) is a robust prognostic parameter for LV strain. It has proved to be more sensitive than LV ejection fraction (EF) as a measure of LV systolic function and is a strong predictor of outcome.

Aim: To determine whether GLS can be used as a reliable marker and its cut-off value for IABP insertion in patients undergoing elective off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG).

Settings And Design: A prospective observational clinical study which included 100 adult patients scheduled for elective OPCABG.

Materials And Methods: Two-dimensional (2D) speckle tracking echocardiography (STE)-estimated GLS was computed and compared with LV EF measured by three dimensional (3D) echocardiography for the insertion of IABP. The intensive care unit (ICU) parameters were correlated with echocardiographic parameters to predict early post-operative outcome.

Results: IABP insertion correlates better with GLS (post-revascularization > pre-revascularization) than with 3D LV EF. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed the highest area under the curve (AUC, 0.972) with a cut-off value of > -9.8% for GLS compared to 3D LV EF (AUC, 0.938) with a cut-off value of ≤ 44%. ICU parameters show better correlation with E/e'> GLS > WMSI than 3D LV EF.

Conclusion: GLS is a better predictor of IABP insertion compared to 3D LV EF in patients undergoing OPCABG.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10451142PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_144_22DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

iabp insertion
16
patients undergoing
12
left ventricular
8
global longitudinal
8
longitudinal strain
8
ejection fraction
8
insertion patients
8
off-pump coronary
8
coronary artery
8
artery bypass
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: In patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (AMICS), the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) remains the most commonly used form of mechanical circulatory support (MCS). However, information on the characteristics of non-responders is limited. This study evaluated the risk factors associated with 30-day mortality in a cohort of patients with AMICS, on IABP support.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pheochromocytoma and paragangliomas (PPGLs) crises can be triggered by various factors, including norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), which worsen symptoms in patients with PPGLs. Therefore, attention should be paid to the potential for serious adverse reactions in patients with PPGLs taking ADHD medications. A 21-year-old man presented to the emergency department with acute onset of severe respiratory and circulatory failure after initiating atomoxetine treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[How to Insert an Intraaortic Balloon Pumping( IABP)].

Kyobu Geka

September 2024

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kyorin University, Mitaka, Japan.

Article Synopsis
  • * Cardiovascular surgeons need to be skilled in the use and management of IABP, even though it's typically inserted by interventional cardiologists using radiofluoroscopic guidance.
  • * The paper outlines a safe approach for performing IABP insertion using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance, particularly in challenging situations during cardiac surgeries.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background The use of intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) effectively reduces left ventricular afterload and significantly increases coronary perfusion pressure by raising aortic diastolic pressure. This study examined the short and medium-term outcomes of 22,540 adult cardiac surgical patients requiring an IABP. Methods From 2009 to 2018, 1114 patients (4.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study investigates the outcomes of patients with cardiogenic shock who received an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) followed by an Impella device, revealing a lack of significant difference in 30-day mortality and major complications compared to those receiving Impella as the primary support.
  • Despite initial worse clinical conditions in the IABP-Impella group, after matching for baseline characteristics, the two groups showed comparable outcomes.
  • Notably, the IABP-Impella group had a higher rate of infection and required more additional mechanical support, highlighting potential complications related to the escalation strategy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!