Introduction: Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty has been shown to be a successful treatment modality for isolated lateral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. The reproduction of proper knee kinematics, limb alignment, as well as proper soft tissue balancing and component positioning have been shown to be of the utmost importance for a successful unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Robotic assistance has shown to be a reliable tool in order to replicate these factors, as compared to manual instrumentation alone. Recent studies have shown the potential of robotic-assisted surgery in controlling these surgical factors for medial UKA; however, studies assessing outcomes of robotic-assisted lateral UKA (RAUKA) are lacking. Therefore, a retrospective single-center study was performed to assess outcomes of lateral RAUKA.

Materials And Methods: Patients who underwent lateral RAUKA from a single surgeon at a central institution between January 2008 and June 2017 were identified. All patients received a lateral UKA with a fixed-bearing metal backed onlay tibial component. Patients over the age of 18, with at least a five-year follow-up and a lateral UKA were contacted by phone and asked a series of questions to determine satisfaction and survivorship. Each patient was asked in a "yes" or "no" manner, if they have had their implant revised or reoperated for any reason, and a 5-point Likert scale was used to assess satisfaction.

Results: Data was collected from 50 patients (53 knees). Of the patients that responded: 32 (60%) were right knees; 32 (60%) were female, and average follow-up was 7.6 years (5-14 years). Of the 53 knees, one had a revision (98% survivorship). Excluding the revision, 51 (98%) of the included cases were either "very satisfied" or "satisfied" with their surgery.

Discussion/conclusions: Robotic-arm assisted lateral UKA was found to have high survivorship and a satisfaction rate in patients that had at least a five-year follow-up. In the future, larger prospective comparison studies with longer follow-ups are necessary to adequately compare survivorship and satisfaction rates of robotic-assisted lateral UKA to conventional UKA.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.52198/23.STI.42.OS1672DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lateral uka
20
unicompartmental knee
12
knee arthroplasty
12
five-year follow-up
12
lateral
10
robotic-arm assisted
8
assisted lateral
8
lateral unicompartmental
8
uka
8
robotic-assisted lateral
8

Similar Publications

Intraoperatively identified patellofemoral osteoarthritis: no significant impact on short-term outcomes of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

January 2025

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, No.20, Chazhong road, Fuzhou, 350005, China.

Background And Objective: The efficacy of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in patients with intraoperatively identified patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) has been a subject of debate. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the early outcomes of UKA in patients with varying intraoperative PFOA conditions and to explore the relationship between the location of PFOA and the position of the prosthesis post-UKA. Our aim was to determine whether the presence of PFOA affects the short-term success of medial UKA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This meta-analysis evaluates the comparative efficacy of lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty (UKA) versus medial UKA in treating unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

Methods: We systematically searched Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from January 2000 to September 2024. Literature screening, quality assessment, and data extraction were conducted based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is relatively less common than medial UKA. There has been no comparative analysis of the constitutional phenotypes of knees that underwent medial and lateral UKA. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification of knees that underwent medial and lateral UKA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Unrestricted kinematic alignment (uKA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has the theoretical advantage of reproducing patients' constitutional alignment and restoring the pre-arthritic joint line position and obliquity. However, modifications of the original uKA technique have been proposed due to the potential risk of mechanical failure and instability. Given the significant variability in soft tissue behavior within the same bony morphology group, uKA pure knee resurfacing could be occasionally detrimental.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The presence of full-thickness cartilage in the lateral compartment on valgus stress radiography is a criterion for medial mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, the appropriateness of medial UKA is uncertain when preoperative MRI shows extrusion of the lateral meniscus. We therefore assessed how preoperative MRI-detected lateral meniscus extrusion affects mid-term functional outcomes after mobile-bearing UKA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!