Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The effect of wing shape on a forward-flying butterfly via decoupled factors of the wing-swept angle and the aspect ratio (AR) was investigated numerically. The wing-shape effect is a major concern in the design of a microaerial vehicle (MAV). In nature, the wing of a butterfly consists of partially overlapping forewing and hindwing; when the forewing sweeps forward or backward relative to the hindwing, the wing-swept angle and the AR of the entire wing simultaneously change. The effects of the wing-swept angle and AR on aerodynamics are coupled. To decouple their effects, we established wing-shape models with varied combinations of the wing-swept angle and AR based on the experimental measurement of two butterfly species (Papilio polytes and Kallima inachus) and developed a numerical simulation for analysis. In each model, the forewing and hindwing overlapped partially, constructing a single wing. Across the models, the wing-swept angle and AR of these single wings varied sequentially. The results show that, through our models, the effects of the wing-swept angle and AR were decoupled; both have distinct flow mechanisms and aerodynamic force trends and are consistent in the two butterfly species. For a fixed AR, a backward-swept wing increases lift and drag because of the enhanced attachment of the leading-edge vortex with increased strength of the wingtip vortex and the spanwise flow. For a fixed wing-swept angle, a small AR wing increases lift and decreases drag because of the large region of low pressure downstream and the wake-capture effect. Coupling these effects, the largest lift-to-drag ratio occurs for a forward-swept wing with the smallest AR. These results indicate that, in a flapping forward flight, sweeping a forewing forward relative to a hindwing is suitable for cruising. The flow mechanisms and decoupled and coupled effects of the wing-swept angle and the AR presented in this paper provide insight into the flight of a butterfly and the design of a MAV.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.107.065105 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!