Objectives: An increasing number of COVID-19 patients were treated with continuous positive airways pressure (CPAP). To evaluate the clinical effects of personalized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) compared to standard fixed PEEP in COVID-19 patients requiring CPAP.
Methods: This is a single center, prospective, randomized clinical study. Sixty-three COVID-19 patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure and bilateral pneumonia were randomized in two Groups: Group A received CPAP with fixed PEEP of 10 cm HO, Group B performed the "PEEP trial", that consists in the evaluation of best PEEP defined as the PEEP value that precedes the echographic appearance of "lung pulse" determining a PaO/FiO increase. Primary outcome was composite in-hospital mortality + intubation, secondary outcome was the percentage increase of PaO/FiO. As safety indicator, the incidence of pneumothorax was collected.
Results: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in and 31 in . The two groups were comparable for clinical characteristics and laboratory parameters. The primary outcome occurred in 36 (57.1 %) patients: 23 (71.8 %) in and 13 (41.9 %) in (p<0.01). Mortality was higher in (53.1 vs. 19.3 %, p<0.01), while intubation rate was comparable between groups. showed a higher PaO/FiO increase than (34.9 vs. 13.1 %, p<0.01). Five cases of pneumothorax were reported in , none in .
Conclusions: Lung ultrasound-guided PEEP trial is associated with lower mortality in COVID-19 patients treated with CPAP. Identifying the best PEEP is useful to increase oxygenation and reduce the incidence of complications.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jbcpp-2023-0165 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!