We discuss significant challenges to assumptions of exclusivity and highlight methodological and conceptual pitfalls in inferring deliberative processes from reasoning responses. Causes of normative-deliberative gaps are considered (e.g., disputed or misunderstood normative standards, strategy preferences, task interpretations, cognitive ability, mindware and thinking dispositions) and a soft normativist approach is recommended for developing the dual-process 2.0 architecture.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X22003107 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Explaining normative-deliberative gaps is essential to dual-process theorizing.
Behav Brain Sci
July 2023
School of Psychology & Computer Science, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, https://www.uclan.ac.uk/academics/professor-linden-ball.
We discuss significant challenges to assumptions of exclusivity and highlight methodological and conceptual pitfalls in inferring deliberative processes from reasoning responses. Causes of normative-deliberative gaps are considered (e.g.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!