We compare the predictions of two important proposals made by De Neys to findings in the anchoring effect literature. Evidence for an anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic supports his proposal that system 1 and system 2 are non-exclusive. The relationship between psychophysical noise and anchoring effects, however, challenges his proposal that epistemic uncertainty determines the involvement of system 2 corrective processes in judgment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X2200303X | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!