The proliferation of anti-vaccination arguments is a threat to the success of many immunization programmes. Effective rebuttal of contrarian arguments requires an approach that goes beyond addressing flaws in the arguments, by also considering the attitude roots-that is, the underlying psychological attributes driving a person's belief-of opposition to vaccines. Here, through a pre-registered systematic literature review of 152 scientific articles and thematic analysis of anti-vaccination arguments, we developed a hierarchical taxonomy that relates common arguments and themes to 11 attitude roots that explain why an individual might express opposition to vaccination. We further validated our taxonomy on coronavirus disease 2019 anti-vaccination misinformation, through a combination of human coding and machine learning using natural language processing algorithms. Overall, the taxonomy serves as a theoretical framework to link expressed opposition of vaccines to their underlying psychological processes. This enables future work to develop targeted rebuttals and other interventions that address the underlying motives of anti-vaccination arguments.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01644-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anti-vaccination arguments
16
systematic literature
8
literature review
8
underlying psychological
8
opposition vaccines
8
arguments
7
taxonomy
4
taxonomy anti-vaccination
4
arguments systematic
4
review text
4

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) play a key role in various connective tissue disorders, contributing to uncertainty around their prognosis and symptoms, particularly in the context of rising anti-vaccination sentiments.
  • A study conducted with 210 Polish nursing students in 2022 found that unvaccinated students had a higher prevalence of COVID-19 and a significantly higher frequency of antinuclear antibodies compared to vaccinated students.
  • The findings suggest that concerns about vaccinations leading to autoimmune diseases are unfounded, highlighting the importance of vaccinations for healthy individuals.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This paper challenges historically preconceived notions surrounding a minor's ability to make medical decisions, arguing that federal health law should be reformed to allow minors with capacity as young as age 12 to consent to their own Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention (CDC)-approved COVID-19 vaccinations. This proposal aligns with and expands upon current exceptions to limitations on adolescent decision-making. This analysis reviews the historic and current anti-vaccination sentiment, examines legal precedence and rationale, outlines supporting ethical arguments regarding adolescent decision-making, and offers rebuttals to anticipated ethical counterarguments.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Vaccine hesitancy is a multi-faceted phenomenon, deeply rooted in cultural, socioeconomic and personal background. Communication is deemed fundamental in fighting vaccine hesitancy. Medical communication should be accessible, relying both on an emotional approach and accurate information.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Investigating Anti-Vaccination Stances on Social Media: an Assignment To Promote Science Literacy.

J Microbiol Biol Educ

August 2023

Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto, Scarborough, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

In this digital age in which social media use among young adults continues to rise, consideration of the impact of these platforms on our students and on science literacy pedagogy is essential. This has been highlighted during the 2019 coronavirus disease pandemic, when mis- and disinformation surrounding the pandemic and vaccinations were so prevalent on social media platforms that it provoked a cautionary announcement from the World Health Organization. We describe here the structure of an assignment aimed to promote science literacy by encouraging students to explore antivaccination stances on social media and evaluate the scientific validity of such claims using scientific literature.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The proliferation of anti-vaccination arguments is a threat to the success of many immunization programmes. Effective rebuttal of contrarian arguments requires an approach that goes beyond addressing flaws in the arguments, by also considering the attitude roots-that is, the underlying psychological attributes driving a person's belief-of opposition to vaccines. Here, through a pre-registered systematic literature review of 152 scientific articles and thematic analysis of anti-vaccination arguments, we developed a hierarchical taxonomy that relates common arguments and themes to 11 attitude roots that explain why an individual might express opposition to vaccination.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!