A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of Bipolar vascular sealing and conventional back-table dissection in terms of post-renal transplant drainage and back-table preparation times. | LitMetric

Objective: The usage of vessel sealing devices has been gaining popularity in all surgical specialties. Post-renal transplant drain placement is a common practice among transplant surgeons. However, prolonged drainage accompanied by surgical wound complications and perirenal fluid collections is a frequent complication experienced by the recipients. This study aimed to compare Bipolar vascular sealing with conventional back-table dissection in terms of post-renal transplant drainage duration, amount, surgical wound complication, and back-table preparation time.

Patients And Methods: A double-blind clinical study randomizes recipients into 2 groups, using Bipolar vascular sealing (Group 1) and conventional ligation (Group 2) back-table dissection. Variables such as recipient age, gender, body mass index (BMI), cause of end-stage renal disease, amount and duration of surgical drainage, back-table time, and cold ischemia time (CIT) were collected prospectively.

Results: Ninety-eight consecutive living donor (M/F: 69/29) renal transplant recipients were enrolled in this prospective randomized clinical trial. There were 49 patients in each group. The mean BMI was 26.76±4.57. There was no difference among the groups regarding recipient age, BMI, total drainage, and surgical drainage duration. The surgical site infection rate was not different between the two groups. Group 1 had significantly shorter back-table time, with mean back-table time being 15.26±2.51 minutes in Group 1 and 28.83±6.27 minutes in Group 2 (p<0.001). The CIT was also significantly different between the 2 groups (p<0.001). In Group 1, the recorded CIT was 43.3±11.4, and in Group 2, 57.1±13.3 minutes.

Conclusions: The use of Bipolar vascular sealing to seal lymphatic vessels at the back-table is feasible, safe, and easy to perform. It also expedites the dissection and shortens the time required for back-table graft preparation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202307_32981DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bipolar vascular
12
vascular sealing
12
back-table dissection
12
post-renal transplant
12
back-table time
12
sealing conventional
8
back-table
8
conventional back-table
8
dissection terms
8
terms post-renal
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!