Recommendations for Assessing the Quality of Clinical Faculty Members' Journal Publications.

Am J Pharm Educ

University of Arizona, R. Ken Coit College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice & Science, Tucson, AZ, USA. Electronic address:

Published: November 2023

Evaluation of clinical faculty involves an assessment of the quality of their publications in addition to quantity (number) of publications. In contrast to assessing quantity, assessing quality is difficult. The purpose of this paper is to discuss practical considerations and provide recommendations related to quality of publications that clinical faculty members should bear in mind as part of their overall scholarship activity. College and schools of pharmacy may not provide written criteria for assessing quality of publications, so it is important that clinical faculty members seek guidance from their department chair or direct supervisor, experienced colleagues, and formal or informal mentors or advisers. One criterion for assessing quality is whether a publication was evaluated through a peer-review process although there are other considerations including dissemination of the paper via search engines such as PubMed. Clinical faculty also need to consider authorship order on their papers and potential journals for submission.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2023.100575DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical faculty
20
assessing quality
16
quality publications
12
publications clinical
8
faculty members
8
quality
6
clinical
5
faculty
5
publications
5
recommendations assessing
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!