AI Article Synopsis

  • Group A streptococcus causes 20-40% of childhood sore throats (pharyngitis), often requiring antibiotics only in bacterial cases; most guidelines suggest confirming infection before treatment.
  • This study evaluates the effectiveness of a new saliva test (Abbott ID NOW STREP A2) for detecting group A streptococcus compared to the traditional throat swab test in children with pharyngitis.
  • The research aims to recruit 800 children and will assess various outcomes, including sensitivity, result time, and satisfaction among patients and parents, to see if saliva testing is a viable and convenient alternative to throat swabs.

Article Abstract

Background: Group A streptococcus is found in 20-40% of cases of childhood pharyngitis; the remaining cases are viral. Streptococcal pharyngitis ("strep throat") is usually treated with antibiotics, while these are not indicated in viral cases. Most guidelines recommend relying on a diagnostic test confirming the presence of group A streptococcus before prescribing antibiotics. Conventional first-line tests are rapid antigen detection tests based on throat swabs. Recently, rapid nucleic acid tests were developed; they allow the detection of elements of the genome of group A streptococcus. We hypothesize that these rapid nucleic acid tests are sensitive enough to be performed on saliva samples instead of throat swabs, which could be more convenient in practice.

Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective diagnostic accuracy study evaluating the performance of a rapid nucleic acid test for group A streptococcus (Abbott ID NOW STREP A2) in saliva, compared with a conventional pharyngeal rapid antigen detection test (EXACTO PRO STREPTATEST, lateral flow assay, comparator test), with a composite reference standard of throat culture and group A streptococcus PCR in children with pharyngitis in primary care (i.e., 27 primary care pediatricians or general practitioners). To ensure group A streptococcus is not missed, the salivary rapid nucleic acid test requires a minimally acceptable value of sensitivity (primary outcome) set at 80%. Assuming 35% of participants will have group A streptococcus, we will recruit 800 consecutive children with pharyngitis. Secondary outcomes will include difference in sensitivity between the pharyngeal rapid antigen detection test and the salivary rapid nucleic acid test; variability in sensitivity and specificity of the salivary rapid nucleic acid test with the level of McIsaac score; time to obtain the result of the salivary rapid nucleic acid test; patient, physician, and parents satisfaction; and barriers and facilitators to using rapid tests for group A streptococcus in primary care.

Ethics And Dissemination: Approved by the Institutional Review Board "Comité de protection des personnes Ile de France I" (no. 2022-A00085-38). Results will be presented at international meetings and disseminated in peer-reviewed journals.

Trial Registration Number: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05521568.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10347703PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41512-023-00150-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rapid nucleic
32
nucleic acid
32
group streptococcus
32
acid test
24
salivary rapid
16
rapid
12
primary care
12
rapid antigen
12
antigen detection
12
test
10

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!