Objectives: The use of electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems to support the management of patients with chronic kidney disease is increasing. This mixed-methods study aimed to comprehensively identify existing and developing ePRO systems, used in nephrology settings globally, ascertaining key characteristics and factors for successful implementation.

Study Design: ePRO systems and developers were identified through a scoping review of the literature and contact with field experts. Developers were invited to participate in a structured survey, to summarise key system characteristics including: (1) system objectives, (2) population, (3) PRO measures used, (4) level of automation, (5) reporting, (6) integration into workflow and (7) links to electronic health records/national registries. Subsequent semistructured interviews were conducted to explore responses.

Setting And Participants: Eligible systems included those being developed or used in nephrology settings to assess ePROs and summarise results to care providers. System developers included those with a key responsibility for aspects of the design, development or implementation of an eligible system.

Analytical Approach: Structured survey data were summarised using descriptive statistics. Interview transcripts were analysed using Codebook Thematic Analysis using domains from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Results: Fifteen unique ePRO systems were identified across seven countries; 10 system developers completed the structured survey and 7 participated in semistructured interviews. Despite system heterogeneity, reported features required for effective implementation included early and sustained patient involvement, clinician champions and expanding existing electronic platforms to integrate ePROs. Systems demonstrated several common features, with the majority being implemented within research settings, thereby affecting system implementation readiness for real-world application.

Conclusions: There has been considerable research investment in ePRO systems. The findings of this study outline key system features and factors to support the successful implementation of ePROs in routine kidney care.Cite Now.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10347510PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070927DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

epro systems
20
structured survey
12
electronic patient-reported
8
patient-reported outcome
8
systems
8
systems nephrology
8
nephrology settings
8
key system
8
semistructured interviews
8
system developers
8

Similar Publications

Background: The associations between self-reported chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been reported using various instruments to assess itch. Data collection via multiple CKD-aP instruments allows the evaluation of different domains and measurements of CKD-aP burden and may help tailor data capture for future research or clinical care.

Methods: An electronic PRO (ePRO) survey was distributed to European hemodialysis (HD) patients enrolled in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) in 2021-23.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to create an electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) system to monitor chemotherapy patients at an outpatient oncology clinic and assess its effects.* -
  • Participants reported 28 symptoms weekly using their devices, with alerts sent to healthcare providers when serious symptoms were reported, leading to timely interventions.* -
  • The results showed that while ePRO participants had better overall survival and clinical outcomes than non-participants, these outcomes did not significantly differ from those before the ePRO implementation.*
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Utilising electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) to monitor symptoms can improve patient outcomes. However, ePRO systems are typically not co-designed with end-users which may limit their utility and long-term sustainability. We aimed to co-design a real-time ePRO symptom monitoring system for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) toxicities.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

[ePROs in the routine care of a major oncology center: Results and experiences].

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes

December 2024

Nationales Zentrum für Tumorerkrankungen (NCT/ UCC), Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.

Background: To what extent and under what conditions electronically captured patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) can be used in routine medical care and contribute to improved patient care is a widely discussed question. In the field of oncology, few studies in Germany have focused this topic that go beyond the scope of time-limited studies.

Method: First, we present the centrally coordinated collection of ePROs in the routine care of a comprehensive cancer center of the German Cancer Aid in its development, and then describe its qualitative dimension.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Electronic patient-reported outcomes as digital therapeutics for patients with cancer: a narrative review of current practices and future directions.

Int J Clin Oncol

November 2024

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.

Improved cancer treatment outcomes have increased the demand for medical care that considers the quality of life of patients with cancer. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) help assess the quality of life because they involve direct evaluation of the patients. Recently, electronic PROs (ePROs) have been used in clinical cancer care settings in Europe and the United States.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!