Purpose: We aimed to test the extended capabilities of the SRS protocol by validating its capacity to predict the power outputs for targeted metabolic rates (V̇O 2 ) and time-to-task failure ( Tlim ) within the heavy- and severe-intensity domain, respectively.
Methods: Fourteen young individuals completed (i) an SRS protocol from which the power outputs at GET and RCP (RCP CORR ), and the work accruable above RCP CORR , defined as W ' RAMP , were derived; (ii) one heavy-intensity bout at a power output predicted to elicit a targeted V̇O 2 equidistant from GET and RCP; and (iii) four severe-intensity trials at power outputs predicted to elicit targeted Tlim at minutes 2.5, 5, 10, and 13. These severe-intensity trials were also used to compute the constant-load-derived critical power and W ´ ( W ' CONSTANT ).
Results: Targeted (2.41 ± 0.52 L·min -1 ) and measured (2.43 ± 0.52 L·min -1 ) V̇O 2 at the identified heavy-intensity power output (162 ± 43 W) were not different ( P = 0.71) and substantially concordant (CCC = 0.95). Likewise, targeted and measured Tlim for the four identified severe-intensity power outputs were not different ( P > 0.05), and the aggregated coefficient of variation was 10.7% ± 8.9%. The derived power outputs at RCP CORR (192 ± 53 W) and critical power (193 ± 53 W) were not different ( P = 0.65) and highly concordant (CCC = 0.99). There were also no differences between W ' RAMP and W ' CONSTANT ( P = 0.51).
Conclusions: The SRS protocol can accurately predict power outputs to elicit discrete metabolic rates and exercise durations, thus providing, with time efficiency, a high precision for the control of the metabolic stimulus during exercise.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003249 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!