Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: Keratoconus relapse after penetrating keratoplasty is a rare condition that may result in severe visual deterioration and corneal graft thinning. Therefore, treatment to stabilize the cornea should be considered. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Corneal Cross-Linking (CXL) in eyes with relapse of keratoconus after penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus.
Materials And Methods: A retrospective review of eyes that developed keratoconus relapse following a penetrating keratoplasty and treated with CXL. The main outcome measures were change in maximal keratometry (Kmax), best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCVA), thinnest corneal thickness (TCT) and central corneal thickness (CCT), and complications.
Results: We identified 10 consecutive eyes of 9 patients. Preoperative median BCVA before the CXL and 1 year after the CXL procedure remained stable (p = 0.68). The median (IQR) of Kmax improved from 63.2 (24.9) D before the CXL procedure to 62.2 (27.1) D at 1 year postoperatively (P = 0.028). Median TCT and CCT also remained with no significant change 1 year after CXL. No complications were noted following the procedure.
Conclusion: CXL in eyes with keratoconus relapse after keratoplasty is a safe and effective procedure enabling not only visual stabilization but also might bring keratometry improvement. Routine follow-up after keratoplasty should be performed for early detection of keratoconus relapse and CXL is timely advised when such a relapse is documented.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10792-023-02807-x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!