This article describes how size-based health and beauty ideals made their way into the medical field through the eugenics movement of the 19th to 20th centuries and were validated using so-called "standard weight" tables. They became even more mainstream with the 20th-century tool to replace standard weight tables: body mass index (BMI). BMI, then, is a continuation of white supremacist embodiment norms, racializing fat phobia under the guise of clinical authority. This article describes the key players in the legacy of size-based mandates, which fall under what I have labeled the "white bannerol of health and beauty." This pseudoscientific bannerol has helped forge oppressive conceptions of fatness as an indicator of ill health and "low" racial quality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2023.535DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fat phobia
8
article describes
8
bmi fetishizes
4
fetishizes white
4
white embodiment
4
embodiment racializes
4
racializes fat
4
phobia article
4
describes size-based
4
size-based health
4

Similar Publications

Eating disorders comprise an array of mental disturbance with profound implications for individuals' psychophysical and societal well-being. Extensive research has elucidated the role of the Big Five personality traits in explaining individual differences in the risk of eating disorders, overshadowing alternative personality taxonomies, such as the Dark Triad - DT (i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Internalization of weight bias and stigma: Scientific challenges and opportunities.

Am Psychol

December 2024

Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida.

Weight bias and stigma are widespread, unjust, and harmful to health. Increased empirical attention to the internalization of weight bias and stigma (or weight self-stigma) has revealed significant health implications that require further study and intervention. This review summarizes current knowledge on the conceptualization, measurement, prevalence, and correlates of internalized weight stigma.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Weightism in Asia: A Narrative Review and Implications for Practice.

J Obes Metab Syndr

December 2024

Department of Educational Psychology & Counselling, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Weightism, also known as weight-related discrimination, is pervasive and believed to be one of the socially accepted types of discrimination in Asia. Weightism is pervasive, impactful, and has significant repercussions on individuals grappling with excess weight. Despite being a major risk factor for obesity, excess weight is not well documented in the Asian literature.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Rethinking obesity care in the United States: Lessons from the cardiovascular disease - Cardiac rehabilitation model.

Curr Probl Cardiol

December 2024

Healthy Living for Pandemic Event Protection (HL - PIVOT) Network, Chicago, IL, United States; HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, MN, United States; Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

The prevalence of obesity in the United States (U.S.), in conjunction with the myriad of detrimental health consequences associated with this disease, justifiably warrants deep concern and characterization as a national health crisis of epidemic proportions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The lack of culturally-sensitive tool masks the epidemiology of weight-bias and internalized-stigma. This study aimed to translate, adapt, and validate the Modified Weight-Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS-M) into Hindi.

Methods: The translation and adaptation process followed the World Health Organization guidelines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!