A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Efficacy and effectiveness of the herbal medicinal product BNO 1016 in the management of acute rhinosinusitis in the context of antibiotic stewardship. | LitMetric

Objectives: To substantiate the clinical efficacy and investigate the real-world effectiveness of the herbal medicinal product BNO 1016 in acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) in the context of antibiotic stewardship.

Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of the clinical trials ARhiSi-1 (EudraCT No. 2008-002794-13) and ARhiSi-2 (EudraCT No. 2009-016682-28) comprising 676 patients, analyzing the reduction of the Major Symptom Score (MSS) and improvement of the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 20 (SNOT-20) by the herbal medicinal product BNO 1016. In addition, we performed a retrospective cohort study including 203,382 patients, comparing the real-life effectiveness of BNO 1016 in reducing ARS-related adverse outcomes in comparison to antibiotics and several other established therapies.

Results: Treatment with BNO 1016 ameliorated symptoms of ARS by reducing MSS by 1.9 points ( < 0.0001) and improved quality of life (QoL) for patients by improving SNOT-20 by 3.5 points ( = 0.001) in comparison to placebo. In patients with moderate/severe symptoms, the positive effects of BNO 1016 were even more pronounced (MSS: -2.3 points ( < 0.0001); SNOT-20: -4.9 points ( = 0.0158)). In addition, treatment with BNO 1016 was as effective or significantly more effective in reducing the risk for adverse ARS-related outcomes such as follow-up antibiotic prescriptions, sick leave ≥7 days or medical appointments due to ARS, especially when compared to antibiotics.

Conclusion: BNO 1016 is a safe and effective treatment for ARS that can help reduce the overuse of antibiotics.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2023.2234274DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bno 1016
20
herbal medicinal
12
medicinal product
12
product bno
12
effectiveness herbal
8
acute rhinosinusitis
8
context antibiotic
8
bno
5
0
5
efficacy effectiveness
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!