Two-sample inference procedures under nonproportional hazards.

Pharm Stat

Department of Statistics and Data Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.

Published: November 2023

We introduce a new two-sample inference procedure to assess the relative performance of two groups over time. Our model-free method does not assume proportional hazards, making it suitable for scenarios where nonproportional hazards may exist. Our procedure includes a diagnostic tau plot to identify changes in hazard timing and a formal inference procedure. The tau-based measures we develop are clinically meaningful and provide interpretable estimands to summarize the treatment effect over time. Our proposed statistic is a U-statistic and exhibits a martingale structure, allowing us to construct confidence intervals and perform hypothesis testing. Our approach is robust with respect to the censoring distribution. We also demonstrate how our method can be applied for sensitivity analysis in scenarios with missing tail information due to insufficient follow-up. Without censoring, Kendall's tau estimator we propose reduces to the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney statistic. We evaluate our method using simulations to compare its performance with the restricted mean survival time and log-rank statistics. We also apply our approach to data from several published oncology clinical trials where nonproportional hazards may exist.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pst.2324DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nonproportional hazards
12
two-sample inference
8
inference procedure
8
hazards exist
8
inference procedures
4
procedures nonproportional
4
hazards
4
hazards introduce
4
introduce two-sample
4
procedure assess
4

Similar Publications

Survival data analysis often uses the Cox proportional hazards (PH) model. This model is widely applied due to its straightforward interpretation of the hazard ratio under the assumption that the hazard rates for two subjects remain constant over time. However, in several randomized clinical trials with long-term survival data comparing two new treatments, it is frequently observed that Kaplan-Meier plots exhibit crossing survival curves.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Competing risks regression for clustered data with covariate-dependent censoring.

Commun Stat Theory Methods

March 2024

Division of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, 53226, Wisconsin,USA.

Competing risks data in clinical trial or observational studies often suffer from cluster effects such as center effects and matched pairs design. The proportional subdistribution hazards (PSH) model is one of the most widely used methods for competing risks data analyses. However, the current literature on the PSH model for clustered competing risks data is limited to covariate-independent censoring and the unstratified model.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We recommend three well-established yet underused statistical methods in social epidemiology: Multiple Informant Models (MIMs), Fractional Regression Model (FRM), and Restricted Mean Survival Time (RMST). MIMs improve how we identify critical windows of exposure over time. FRM addresses the inadequacies of ordinary least squares and logistic regression when dealing with fractional outcomes that are naturally proportions or rates, thereby accommodating data at the boundaries of the unit interval without requiring transformations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The surtvep package is an open-source software designed for estimating time-varying effects in survival analysis using the Cox non-proportional hazards model in R. With the rapid increase in large-scale time-to-event data from national disease registries, detecting and accounting for time-varying effects in medical studies have become crucial. Current software solutions often face computational issues such as memory limitations when handling large datasets.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

When planning an oncology clinical trial, the usual approach is to assume proportional hazards and even an exponential distribution for time-to-event endpoints. Often, besides the gold-standard endpoint overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) is considered as a second confirmatory endpoint. We use a survival multistate model to jointly model these two endpoints and find that neither exponential distribution nor proportional hazards will typically hold for both endpoints simultaneously.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!