AI Article Synopsis

  • This study compares two fully hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated stems used in total hip arthroplasty (THA) regarding femoral canal fill, radiolucency formation, and implant survivorship over two years.
  • The Polar stem showed greater canal fill in the middle third compared to the Corail stem, although both stem types demonstrated similar rates of revision and low instances of radiolucent lines.
  • Overall, the findings suggest that while one stem may offer slight advantages in canal fill, both stems provide comparable mid-term clinical outcomes in THA.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Comparison between fully hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated stems with differing geometry are lacking in the total hip arthroplasty (THA) literature. This study aimed to compare femoral canal fill, radiolucency formation, and 2-year implant survivorship between two commonly used, HA-coated stems.

Methods: All primary THAs performed with two fully HA-coated stems (Polar stem, Smith&Nephew, Memphis, TN and Corail stem, DePuy-Synthes, Warsaw, IN) with a minimum 2-year radiographic follow-up were identified. Radiographic measures of proximal femoral morphology based on the Dorr classification and femoral canal fill were analyzed. Radiolucent lines were identified by Gruen zone. Perioperative characteristics and 2-year survivorship were compared between stem types.

Results: A total of 233 patients were identified with 132 (56.7%) receiving the Polar stem (P) and 101 (43.3%) receiving the Corail stem (C). No differences were observed with respect to proximal femoral morphology. Femoral stem canal fill at the middle third of the stem was greater for P stem patients than for C stem patients (P stem; 0.80 ± 0.08 vs. C stem; 0.77 ± 0.08, p = 0.002), while femoral stem canal fill at the distal third of the stem and presence of subsidence were comparable between groups. A total of six and nine radiolucencies were observed in P stem and C stem patients, respectively. Revision rate at 2-year (P stem; 1.5% vs C stem; 0.0%, p = 0.51) and latest follow-up (P stem; 1.5% vs C stem; 1.0%, p = 0.72) did not differ between groups.

Conclusion: Greater canal fill at the middle third of the stem was observed for the P stem compared to the C stem, however, both stems demonstrated robust and comparable freedom from revision at 2-year and latest follow-up, with low incidences of radiolucent line formation. Mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes for these commonly used, fully HA-coated stems remain equally promising in THA despite variations in canal fill.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04944-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

canal fill
28
stem
22
ha-coated stems
12
third stem
12
stem patients
12
radiolucent formation
8
total hip
8
hip arthroplasty
8
femoral canal
8
fully ha-coated
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!