Assessment of the Performances of Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System and Two Statistical Methods for Diagnosing Coronary Artery Disease.

Background: The accurate diagnosis of cardiac disease is vital in managing patients' health. Data mining and machine learning techniques play an important role in the diagnosis of heart disease. We aimed to examine the diagnostic performances of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for predicting coronary artery disease and compare this with two statistical methods: flexible discriminant analysis (FDA) and logistic regression (LR).

Methods: The data of this study is the result of descriptive-analytical research from the study of Mashhad. We used ANFIS, LR, and FDA to predict coronary artery disease. A total of 7385 subjects were recruited as part of the Mashhad Stroke and Heart Atherosclerotic Disorders (MASHAD) cohort study. The data set contained demographic, serum biochemical parameters, anthropometric, and many other variables. To evaluate the ability of trained ANFIS, LR, and FDA models to diagnose coronary artery disease, we used the Hold-Out method.For analyzing data, we used SPSS v25, R 4.0.4, and MATLAB 2018 software.

Results: The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, Mean squared error (MSE) , and area under the roc curve (AUC) for ANFIS were 83.4%, 80%, 86%, 0.166 and 83.4%. The corresponding values based on the LR method were 72.4%, 74%, 70% , 0.175 and 81.5% and for the FDA method, these measurements were 77.7%, 74%, 81%, 0.223, and 77.6%, respectively.

Conclusion: There was a significant difference between the accuracy of these three methods. The present findings showed that ANFIS was the most accurate method for diagnosing coronary artery disease compared with LR and FDA methods. Thus, it could be a helpful tool to aid medical decision-making for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.