AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study aimed to compare the chances of virologic rebound in COVID-19 patients treated with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir versus those who did not receive treatment, while also evaluating the role of symptoms and resistance mutations post-rebound.
  • - Conducted as an observational cohort study in Boston, participants were ambulatory adults who tested positive for COVID-19, and outcomes were measured based on viral culture results and viral load.
  • - Results showed that 20.8% of those treated with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir experienced virologic rebound, compared to only 1.8% in the untreated group, suggesting a significant association between the treatment and rebound occurrence.

Article Abstract

Objective: To compare the frequency of replication-competent virologic rebound with and without nirmatrelvir-ritonavir treatment for acute COVID-19. Secondary aims were to estimate the validity of symptoms to detect rebound and the incidence of emergent nirmatrelvir-resistance mutations after rebound.

Design: Observational cohort study.

Setting: Multicenter healthcare system in Boston, Massachusetts.

Participants: We enrolled ambulatory adults with a positive COVID-19 test and/or a prescription for nirmatrelvir-ritonavir.

Exposures: Receipt of 5 days of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir treatment versus no COVID-19 therapy.

Main Outcome And Measures: The primary outcome was COVID-19 virologic rebound, defined as either (1) a positive SARS-CoV-2 viral culture following a prior negative culture or (2) two consecutive viral loads ≥4.0 log copies/milliliter after a prior reduction in viral load to <4.0 log copies/milliliter.

Results: Compared with untreated individuals (n=55), those taking nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (n=72) were older, received more COVID-19 vaccinations, and were more commonly immunosuppressed. Fifteen individuals (20.8%) taking nirmatrelvir-ritonavir experienced virologic rebound versus one (1.8%) of the untreated (absolute difference 19.0% [95%CI 9.0-29.0%], P=0.001). In multivariable models, only N-R was associated with VR (AOR 10.02, 95%CI 1.13-88.74). VR occurred more commonly among those with earlier nirmatrelvir-ritonavir initiation (29.0%, 16.7% and 0% when initiated days 0, 1, and ≥2 after diagnosis, respectively, P=0.089). Among participants on N-R, those experiencing rebound had prolonged shedding of replication-competent virus compared to those that did not rebound (median: 14 vs 3 days). Only 8/16 with virologic rebound reported worsening symptoms (50%, 95%CI 25%-75%); 2 were completely asymptomatic. We detected no post-rebound nirmatrelvir-resistance mutations in the NSP5 protease gene.

Conclusions And Relevance: Virologic rebound occurred in approximately one in five people taking nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and often occurred without worsening symptoms. Because it is associated with replication-competent viral shedding, close monitoring and potential isolation of those who rebound should be considered.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10327262PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.23.23288598DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

virologic rebound
12
rebound nirmatrelvir-ritonavir
8
nirmatrelvir-ritonavir treatment
8
sars-cov-2 virologic
4
rebound
4
nirmatrelvir-ritonavir therapy
4
therapy objective
4
objective compare
4
compare frequency
4
frequency replication-competent
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!