AI Article Synopsis

  • H. pylori infections are a significant global health issue, linked to gastric cancer and various ulcers, with a notable prevalence in China, where new treatments are necessary due to high infection rates.
  • The study compares the effectiveness and safety of two new VPZ-based therapies against the traditional BI-based quadruple therapy for treating H. pylori, involving 327 participants in Shenzhen.
  • Participants undergo random assignment to one of the three treatment regimens and follow-up assessments to evaluate treatment success and safety, with adjustments made if initial treatments are ineffective.

Article Abstract

Background: Helicobacter pylori infection and associated diseases are a growing global public health issue. H. pylori infection is the major cause of gastric cancer, over 90% of duodenal ulcers, and over 70% of gastric ulcers. The infection rate of H. pylori is approximately 50%, and approximately 50% of new cases of gastric cancer worldwide occur in China. Bismuth (BI)-based quadruple therapy is recommended as the first-line treatment for H. pylori in China. Vonoprazan (VPZ), a new potassium-competitive acid blocker that can inhibit gastric acid secretion more effectively than proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), has been combined with antibiotics to effectively eradicate H. pylori. In this study, we compared the efficacy and safety of two VPZ-based therapies with that of BI-based therapy for H. pylori treatment.

Methods: A three-armed randomised controlled trial (RCT) is being conducted in Shenzhen, with 327 participants recruited from the Gastroenterology Clinic of the University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital. Patients were diagnosed with H. pylori infection based on a positive C-urea breath test (UBT). Patients are kept naïve to their treatment and are randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to either VPZ-based triple, VPZ-based dual, or BI-based quadruple therapy for 14 days. All groups are subjected to follow-up evaluations of safety, adverse drug reactions, and clinical variables in the first, second, and fourth weeks after treatment. Successful eradication is confirmed by a negative C-UBT six weeks after treatment. If initial treatment fails, (1) those patients are turned to another regimen, or (2) a drug resistance test is conducted, after which an individualised treatment regimen shall be prescribed according to antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The resulting data will be evaluated using intention-treat and a per-protocol analysis.

Discussion: This study is the a RCT aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 14-day VPZ-based triple and dual therapies in comparison with BI-based quadruple therapy. The outcomes of this study may allow treatment recommendations and update drug instructions in China.

Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2200056375). Registered on February 4, 2022, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=141314.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10329349PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-02872-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

quadruple therapy
16
pylori infection
16
bi-based quadruple
12
triple dual
8
pylori
8
helicobacter pylori
8
clinical trial
8
gastric cancer
8
efficacy safety
8
vpz-based triple
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!