A cross-sectional study on three-dimensional compensatory characteristics of maxillary teeth in patients with different types of skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze three-dimensional dental compensation in patients with different types of skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry, using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and three-dimensional reconstruction measurement technology, thereby providing clinical guidance and reference for combined orthodontic and orthognathic treatment.

Methods: 81 patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion with mandibular asymmetry were selected in accordance with the inclusion criteria. According to a new classification method based on the direction and amount of menton deviation relative to ramus deviation, patients were divided into three groups called Type 1, Type 2, and Type 3. In Type 1, the direction of menton deviation was consistent with that of ramus deviation and the amount of menton deviation was greater than that of ramus deviation. In Type 2, the direction of menton deviation was consistent with that of ramus deviation and the amount of menton deviation was smaller than that of ramus deviation. In Type 3, the direction of menton deviation was inconsistent with that of ramus deviation. The maxillary occlusal plane (OP), anterior occlusal plane (AOP), and posterior occlusal plane (POP) were measured on reconstructed CBCT images. The vertical, transverse, and anteroposterior distances from maxillary teeth to reference planes and the 3D angles between the long axis of these teeth and reference planes were measured. These dental variables measured from the deviated and non-deviated sides were compared within each group, as well as among each other.

Results: Of the 81 patients with asymmetrical Class III malocclusion, 52 patients were categorized in Type 1, 12 patients in Type 2, and 17 patients in Type 3. There were significant differences between deviated and non-deviated sides in Type 1 and Type 3 (p < 0.05). In Type 1, the vertical distances of maxillary teeth on the deviated side were lower than those on the non-deviated side, and AOP, OP, and POP on the deviated side were larger than those on the non-deviated side (p < 0.05). In Type 3, the vertical distances of the maxillary teeth on the deviated side were lower (p < 0.05), and the AOP and OP on the deviated side were larger than those on the non-deviated side. In all three groups, the transverse distances of the maxillary teeth from the mid-sagittal plane on the deviated side were larger than those on the non-deviated side (p < 0.05), and the angles between the long axis of maxillary teeth and the mid-sagittal plane on the deviated side were larger, respectively (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The maxillary teeth on the deviated side were observed to have smaller eruption heights in Type 1 and Type 3. In Type 1, AOP, POP, and OP were greater on the deviated side, while in Type 3, only AOP and OP were greater on the deviated side. The maxillary teeth of patients in all three groups on the deviated side were buccal and buccally inclined. Larger sample observations are still needed to further verify these findings.