Mouse-cursor trajectories reveal reduced contextual influence on decision conflict during delay discounting in anorexia nervosa.

Int J Eat Disord

Translational Developmental Neuroscience Section, Division of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Published: October 2023

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates how individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN) make decisions about delayed food rewards, looking for differences in self-control and reward sensitivity compared to healthy controls.
  • Researchers analyzed mouse-cursor movement during a computerized task, focusing on decision-making conflicts and reaction times in both groups of participants.
  • Findings revealed no significant differences in delay discounting or conflict strength in decision-making between AN patients and healthy controls, suggesting that individuals with AN may experience less variability in their decision-making processes, potentially aiding their long-term weight goals.

Article Abstract

Objective: The capacity of individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN) to forgo immediate food rewards in their long-term pursuit of thinness is thought to reflect elevated self-control and/or abnormal reward sensitivity. Prior research attempted to capture an increased tendency to delay gratification in AN using delay-discounting tasks that assess how rapidly the subjective value of rewards decreases as a function of time until receipt. However, significant effects were mostly subtle or absent. Here, we tested whether the process leading to such decisions might be altered in AN.

Method: We recorded mouse-cursor movement trajectories leading to the final choice in a computerized delay-discounting task (238 trials) in 55 acutely underweight females with AN and pairwise age-matched female healthy controls (HC). We tested for group differences in deviations from a direct choice path, a measure of conflict strength in decision making, and whether group moderated the effect of several predictors of conflict strength (e.g., choice difficulty, consistency). We also explored reaction times and changes in trajectory directions (X-flips).

Results: No group differences in delay-discounting parameters or movement trajectories were detected. However, the effect of the aforementioned predictors on deviations (and to a lesser extent reaction times) was reduced in AN.

Discussion: These findings suggest that while delay discounting and conflict strength in decision making are generally unaltered in AN, conflict strength was more stable across different decisions in the disorder. This might enable individuals with AN to pursue (maladaptive) long-term body-weight goals, because particularly conflicting choices may not be experienced as such.

Public Significance: The deviations from a direct path of mouse-cursor movements during a computerized delay-discounting task varied less in people with anorexia nervosa. Assuming such deviations measure decision conflict, we speculate that this increased stability might help people with anorexia nervosa achieve their long-term weight goals, as for them the struggle with the decision to eat high-calorie meals when hungry will be milder, so they would be more likely to skip them.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eat.24019DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

anorexia nervosa
16
conflict strength
16
decision conflict
8
delay discounting
8
movement trajectories
8
computerized delay-discounting
8
delay-discounting task
8
group differences
8
deviations direct
8
strength decision
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!