Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
In this study, the biomechanical effect of six fixation methods for the treatment of posterior malleolus fracture (PMF) were analyzed by finite element method. Fixation models include five different cannulated screw fixation models (0°, 5°, 10°, 15°, 20°) and a posterior plate fixation model. The von Mises stress (VMS) and displacement were used as criteria to evaluate the biomechanical efficiency of the different fixation models. The results demonstrated that the VMS and displacement will increase as the load increases. The buttress plate has better fixed strength and biomechanics results than screws. When the screw fixation angle is 15°, the model has better fixed strength and biomechanical stability than other screws fixation models. Therefore, we recommend the screws fixation with angle of 15° for posterior malleolus fracture, which can be used to guide clinical operation.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2023.2231115 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!