AI Article Synopsis

  • Pembrolizumab and tislelizumab have shown promising results for treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in combination with chemotherapy, but a direct comparison was lacking.
  • An indirect comparison using data from 6 randomized trials (over 2,000 participants) indicated no significant differences in overall survival, progression-free survival, or adverse events between the two treatments.
  • The analysis suggests that both therapies are similarly effective and safe in combination with chemotherapy, regardless of factors like PD-L1 levels, age, liver metastasis, or smoking status.

Article Abstract

Pembrolizumab and tislelizumab have demonstrated significant clinical benefits in first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC. However, no head-to-head clinical trial has ever compared the optimal choice. Therefore, we conducted an indirect comparison to explore the optimal choice for advanced NSCLC combined with chemotherapy. We conducted a systematic review of randomized trials; the clinical outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). Indirect comparisons between tislelizumab and pembrolizumab were conducted with the Bucher method. Data were abstracted from 6 randomized trials involving more than 2,000 participants. Direct meta-analysis showed that both treatment regimens improved clinical outcomes compared with chemotherapy alone (PFS: hazard ratio (HR) 0.55, 95% CI 0.45-0.67; HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.47-0.60; ORR: relative risk (RR) 1.50, 95% CI 1.32-1.71; RR 1.89, 95% CI 1.44-2.48). Regarding safety outcomes, tislelizumab and pembrolizumab have a higher risk in the incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.03-1.21; RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.24). The indirect comparison showed that there was no significant difference between tislelizumab plus chemotherapy and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in terms of PFS (HR: 1.04, 95% CI 0.82-1.31), ORR (RR: 0.79, 95% CI 0.59-1.07), the incidence of grade 3 or higher AEs (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87-1.12), and AEs leading to death (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.23-2.09). In progression-free survival subgroup analysis, the results demonstrate no significant differences in PFS by PD-L1 TPS expression level, age, liver metastasis status, and smoking status between tislelizumab plus chemotherapy and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. The efficacy and safety of tislelizumab combination chemotherapy were not substantially different from pembrolizumab combination chemotherapy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318343PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1172969DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tislelizumab chemotherapy
12
pembrolizumab chemotherapy
12
indirect comparison
12
randomized trials
12
chemotherapy pembrolizumab
12
95%
10
chemotherapy
9
first-line treatment
8
treatment advanced
8
systematic review
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!