Comparison of vapor bubble kinetics and cleaning efficacy of different root canal irrigation techniques in the apical area beyond the fractured instrument.

Background/purpose: Intracanal fractured instruments hamper adequate root canal disinfection. The aim of this study was to evaluate vapor bubble kinetics and cleaning efficacy of different irrigation techniques in the apical area beyond the fractured instrument.

Materials And Methods: Sixty curved root canal models, in which a 3-mm fragment of a #20 K-file or a WaveOne Gold Primary (WOG) instrument was intentionally separated at 3 mm from the apical foramen, were irrigated with laser-activated irrigation with photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (LAI-PIPS; 20 mJ/15 Hz), laser-activated irrigation using an Er:YAG laser unit (LAI; 30 mJ/20 Hz), or ultrasonic-activated irrigation (UAI) for 5 s. Vapor bubble velocity and counts were analyzed using high-speed video imaging. To evaluate canal wall cleanliness, 40 canals of extracted human teeth with an intentionally separated 3-mm WOG fragment in the canal at 3 mm from the apical foramen were irrigated with LAI-PIPS, LAI, UAI or conventional syringe irrigation, using 17% EDTA (30 s, two cycles), saline (30 s), and 3% NaOCl (30 s, three cycles) as irrigants. Debris and smear layer on the apical canal wall beyond the fractured instrument were scored using scanning electron microscopy.

Results: LAI-PIPS and LAI demonstrated higher vapor bubble counts than UAI. The WOG fragment permitted higher bubble velocity and count than the K-file fragment. LAI-PIPS and LAI showed better debris and smear removal than the other techniques.

Conclusion: LAI and LAI-PIPS demonstrated higher vaporized bubble kinetics and better cleaning efficacy in the apical area, even in the presence of a fractured instrument.