Aortic diastolic pressure decay (DPD) has been shown to have considerable pathophysiological relevance in the assessment of vascular health, as it is significantly affected by arterial stiffening. Nonetheless, the aortic pressure waveform is rarely available and hence the utility of the aortic DPD is limited. On the other hand, carotid blood pressure is often used as a surrogate of central (aortic) blood pressure in cardiovascular monitoring. Although the two waveforms are inherently different, it is unknown whether the aortic DPD shares a common pattern with the carotid DPD. In this study, we compared the DPD time constant of the aorta (aortic RC) and the DPD time constant of the carotid artery (carotid RC) using an in-silico-generated healthy population from a previously validated one-dimensional numerical model of the arterial tree. Our results demonstrated that there is near-absolute agreement between the aortic RC and the carotid RC. In particular, a correlation of ~ 1 was reported for a distribution of aortic/carotid RC values equal to 1.76 ± 0.94 s/1.74 ± 0.87 s. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the DPD of the aortic and the carotid pressure waveform. The findings indicate a strong correlation between carotid DPD and aortic DPD, supported by the examination of curve shape and the diastolic decay time constant across a wide range of simulated cardiovascular conditions. Additional investigation is required to validate these results in human subjects and assess their applicability in vivo.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10319712 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37622-y | DOI Listing |
BMC Cardiovasc Disord
December 2024
Cardiology Department, Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, WWL NHS Trust, Wigan, UK.
Background: Concomitant cardiac amyloidosis (CA) and aortic stenosis (AS) may be mistaken for isolated AS, potentially impacting the treatment strategy and patient's prognosis. Therefore, it is crucial to distinguish between these conditions, as failure to promptly diagnose CA may lead to considerable complications. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic value of strain predictors in patients with concomitant CA and AS compared to isolated AS.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAim: The relative apical sparing pattern of left ventricular (LV) longitudinal strain (RELAPS]>1) has been described as a typical sign of cardiac amyloidosis (CA). The objective was to validate this pattern in concomitant CA and aortic stenosis (AS) and to identify new echocardiographic variables suggestive of CA in the presence of AS.
Methods And Results: 324 consecutive patients (age 81.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
January 2025
Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, Bern, CH - 3010, Switzerland.
Future Cardiol
October 2024
Cardiology Department, Hospital Senhora da Oliveira - Guimarães, Guimarães, 4835-044, Portugal.
To evaluate the prevalence of TTR amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) in severe aortic stenosis (SAS) patients, and to determine the independent predictors of major adverse events (MAE). 91 SAS patients >65 years with an interventricular septum thickness ≥12.5 mm were referred for aortic valve replacement (AVR).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Pharmacol
July 2024
MTA-DE Lendület Vascular Pathophysiology Research Group, Research Centre for Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!