AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study investigated the relationship between quality of life (QoL) and survival outcomes (progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS)) in phase III trials of new treatments for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
  • - Out of 81 reviewed randomized controlled trials, 37% showed improved QoL with experimental treatments, while QoL did not significantly differ in around 59% of trials. A significant correlation was observed between QoL and PFS, especially in studies testing targeted therapies.
  • - However, QoL did not significantly correlate with OS outcomes, indicating that while some new treatments may enhance QoL, they do not always lead to longer survival rates.

Article Abstract

Background: In addition to improving survival outcomes, new oncology treatments should lead to amelioration of patients' quality of life (QoL). Herein, we examined whether QoL results correlated with PFS and OS outcomes in phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating new systemic treatments in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: The systematic search of PubMed was conducted in October 2022. We identified 81 RCTs testing novel drugs in metastatic NSCLC and published in the English language in a PubMed-indexed journal between 2012 and 2021. Only trials reporting QoL results and at least one survival outcome between OS and PFS were selected. For each RCT, we assessed whether global QoL was "superior," "inferior," or with "non-statistically significant difference" in the experimental arm compared to the control arm.

Results: Experimental treatments led to superior QoL in 30 (37.0%) RCTs and inferior QoL in 3 (3.7%) RCTs. In the remaining 48 (59.3%) RCTs, a statistically significant difference between the experimental and control arms was not found. Of note, we found a statistically significant association between QoL and PFS improvements (X = 3.93, p = 0.0473). In more detail, this association was not significant in trials testing immunotherapy or chemotherapy. On the contrary, in RCTs testing target therapies, QoL results positively correlated with PFS outcomes (p = 0.0196). This association was even stronger in the 32 trials testing EGFR or ALK inhibitors (p = 0.0077). On the other hand, QoL results did not positively correlate with OS outcomes (X = 0.81, p = 0.368). Furthermore, we found that experimental treatments led to superior QoL in 27/57 (47.4%) trials with positive results and in 3/24 (12.5%) RCTs with negative results (p = 0.0028). Finally, we analyzed how QoL data were described in publications of RCTs in which QoL outcomes were not improved (n = 51). We found that a favorable description of QoL results was associated with sponsorship by industries (p = 0.0232).

Conclusions: Our study reveals a positive association of QoL results with PFS outcomes in RCTs testing novel treatments in metastatic NSCLC. This association is particularly evident for target therapies. These findings further emphasize the relevance of an accurate assessment of QoL in RCTs in NSCLC.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10318754PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-023-02953-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

qol
16
metastatic nsclc
12
pfs outcomes
12
rcts testing
12
rcts
10
phase iii
8
qol survival
8
survival outcomes
8
correlated pfs
8
treatments metastatic
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!