Objectives: This study aimed to compare the bond strength and enamel damage following debonding of metal brackets cured by different light-curing modes: conventional, soft start, and pulse delay modes.
Material And Methods: Sixty extracted upper premolars were randomly divided into three groups according to the used light-curing mode. Metal brackets were bonded with a light-emitting diode device employing different modes. Group 1: conventional mode (10s mesial+10 s distal); group 2: soft start mode (15s mesial+15s distal); group 3: pulse delay mode (3s mesial+3s distal, followed by 3min of no photoactivation, then 9s mesial+9s distal). Radiant exposure was the same in all study groups. Shear bond strengths of the brackets were tested with a universal testing machine. A stereomicroscope was used to determine the number and length of enamel microcracks. One-Way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to detect significant differences in shear bond strength and microcracks number and length among groups.
Results: The soft start and pulse delay modes produced significantly greater shear bond strength than the conventional mode (19.46±4.90MPa; 20.47±4.97MPa; 12.14±3.79MPa, respectively, P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the soft start and pulse delay groups (P=0.768). The number and length of microcracks increased significantly after debonding in all study groups. The change in microcracks length was not different among study groups.
Conclusion: The soft start and pulse delay modes produced greater bond strength than the conventional mode without predisposing enamel to higher risk of damage. Conservative methods for debonding are still required.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2023.100787 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!