Attentional modulation of inter-areal coherence explained by frequency shifts.

Neuroimage

Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Department of Neurophysics, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Published: August 2023

Inter-areal coherence has been hypothesized as a mechanism for inter-areal communication. Indeed, empirical studies have observed an increase in inter-areal coherence with attention. Yet, the mechanisms underlying changes in coherence remain largely unknown. Both attention and stimulus salience are associated with shifts in the peak frequency of gamma oscillations in V1, which suggests that the frequency of oscillations may play a role in facilitating changes in inter-areal communication and coherence. In this study, we used computational modeling to investigate how the peak frequency of a sender influences inter-areal coherence. We show that changes in the magnitude of coherence are largely determined by the peak frequency of the sender. However, the pattern of coherence depends on the intrinsic properties of the receiver, specifically whether the receiver integrates or resonates with its synaptic inputs. Because resonant receivers are frequency-selective, resonance has been proposed as a mechanism for selective communication. However, the pattern of coherence changes produced by a resonant receiver is inconsistent with empirical studies. By contrast, an integrator receiver does produce the pattern of coherence with frequency shifts in the sender observed in empirical studies. These results indicate that coherence can be a misleading measure of inter-areal interactions. This led us to develop a new measure of inter-areal interactions, which we refer to as Explained Power. We show that Explained Power maps directly to the signal transmitted by the sender filtered by the receiver, and thus provides a method to quantify the true signals transmitted between the sender and receiver. Together, these findings provide a model of changes in inter-areal coherence and Granger-causality as a result of frequency shifts.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7616852PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120256DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

inter-areal coherence
20
coherence
12
frequency shifts
12
empirical studies
12
peak frequency
12
pattern coherence
12
inter-areal
9
inter-areal communication
8
changes inter-areal
8
frequency sender
8

Similar Publications

Although the structure of cortical networks provides the necessary substrate for their neuronal activity, the structure alone does not suffice to understand the activity. Leveraging the increasing availability of human data, we developed a multi-scale, spiking network model of human cortex to investigate the relationship between structure and dynamics. In this model, each area in one hemisphere of the Desikan-Killiany parcellation is represented by a $1\,\mathrm{mm^{2}}$ column with a layered structure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Distinct feedforward and feedback pathways for cell-type specific attention effects.

Neuron

July 2024

Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Department of Neuroinformatics, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6525 Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address:

Selective attention is thought to depend on enhanced firing activity in extrastriate areas. Theories suggest that this enhancement depends on selective inter-areal communication via gamma (30-80 Hz) phase-locking. To test this, we simultaneously recorded from different cell types and cortical layers of macaque V1 and V4.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

It has been suggested that consciousness is closely related to the complexity of the brain. The perturbational complexity index (PCI) has been used in humans and rodents to distinguish conscious from unconscious states based on the global cortical responses (recorded by electroencephalography, EEG) to local cortical stimulation (CS). However, it is unclear how different cortical layers respond to CS and contribute to the resulting intra- and inter-areal cortical connectivity and PCI.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

High gamma coherence between task-responsive sensory-motor cortical regions in a motor reaction-time task.

J Neurophysiol

September 2023

Department of Biomedical Engineering, McKelvey School of Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United States.

Electrical activity at high gamma frequencies (70-170 Hz) is thought to reflect the activity of small cortical ensembles. For example, high gamma activity (often quantified by spectral power) can increase in sensory-motor cortex in response to sensory stimuli or movement. On the other hand, synchrony of neural activity between cortical areas (often quantified by coherence) has been hypothesized as an important mechanism for inter-areal communication, thereby serving functional roles in cognition and behavior.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Decoding social rewards via inter-areal coordination frequency in the brain.

Trends Cogn Sci

October 2023

Division of Behavioral Development, Department of System Neuroscience, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, National Institutes of Natural Sciences, Okazaki, Aichi 444-8585, Japan; Department of Physiological Sciences, School of Life Science, Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), Hayama, Kanagawa 240-0193, Japan. Electronic address:

Vicarious reward plays a pivotal role in shaping altruism and prosociality. However, neural circuit mechanisms underlying the distinction between vicarious reward and experienced reward are poorly understood. Putnam et al.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!