Inter-assay variation between different immunoassays and different mass spectrometry methods hampers the biochemical confirmation of male hypogonadism. Furthermore, some laboratories utilis eassay manufacturer reference ranges that do not necessarily mirror assay performance characteristics, with the lower limit of normality ranging from 4.9 nmol/L to 11 nmol/L. The quality of the normative data underlying commercial immunoassay reference ranges is uncertain. A working group reviewed published evidence and agreed upon standardised reporting guidance to augment total testosterone reports. Evidence-based guidance on appropriate blood sampling, clinical action limits, and other major factors likely to affect the interpretation of results are provided. This article aims to improve the quality of the interpretation of testosterone results by non-specialist clinicians. It also discusses approaches for assay harmonisation which have been successful in some but not all healthcare systems.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10357891PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00045632231179022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

biochemical confirmation
8
male hypogonadism
8
reference ranges
8
standardising biochemical
4
confirmation adult
4
adult male
4
hypogonadism joint
4
joint position
4
position statement
4
statement society
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!