AI Article Synopsis

  • A study developed quality indicators (QIs) for osteoarthritis pain management to improve healthcare quality in primary care settings.
  • A panel of 14 experts reviewed existing guidelines and discarded irrelevant or unfeasible QIs through surveys and discussions, ending up with a final set of 15 focused on crucial aspects like safety and psychological well-being.
  • The resulting QIs represent a consensus that integrates scientific evidence and expert insights, aimed at enhancing the management of osteoarthritis pain in primary care.

Article Abstract

Background: Development of valid and feasible quality indicators (QIs) is needed to track quality initiatives for osteoarthritis pain management in primary care settings.

Methods: Literature search identified published guidelines that were reviewed for QI extraction. A panel of 14 experts was assembled, including primary care physicians, rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, pain specialists, and outcomes research pharmacists. A screening survey excluded QIs that cannot be reliably extracted from the electronic health record or that are irrelevant for osteoarthritis in primary care settings. A validity screening survey used a 9-point Likert scale to rate the validity of each QI based on predefined criteria. During expert panel discussions, stakeholders revised QI wording, added new QIs, and voted to include or exclude each QI. A priority survey used a 9-point Likert scale to prioritize the included QIs.

Results: Literature search identified 520 references published from January 2015 to March 2021 and 4 additional guidelines from professional/governmental websites. The study included 41 guidelines. Extraction of 741 recommendations yielded 115 candidate QIs. Feasibility screening excluded 28 QIs. Validity screening and expert panel discussion excluded 73 QIs and added 1 QI. The final set of 15 prioritized QIs focused on pain management safety, education, weight-management, psychological wellbeing, optimizing first-line medications, referral, and imaging.

Conclusion: This multi-disciplinary expert panel established consensus on QIs for osteoarthritis pain management in primary care settings by combining scientific evidence with expert opinion. The resulting list of 15 prioritized, valid, and feasible QIs can be used to track quality initiatives for osteoarthritis pain management.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10311862PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06637-xDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pain management
20
primary care
20
osteoarthritis pain
16
management primary
12
excluded qis
12
expert panel
12
qis
9
quality indicators
8
valid feasible
8
track quality
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!