AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the cost-effectiveness of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (iRARC) versus open radical cystectomy (ORC) for bladder cancer patients, using data from a clinical trial in the UK.
  • Results show that while iRARC leads to fewer intensive care admissions and hospital readmissions, it also requires significantly more surgery time, resulting in an average additional cost of £1124 per patient.
  • The analysis included outcomes measured over a 90-day period, and utilized both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to assess patient benefits and costs.

Article Abstract

Importance: The value to payers of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion (iRARC) when compared with open radical cystectomy (ORC) for patients with bladder cancer is unclear.

Objectives: To compare the cost-effectiveness of iRARC with that of ORC.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This economic evaluation used individual patient data from a randomized clinical trial at 9 surgical centers in the United Kingdom. Patients with nonmetastatic bladder cancer were recruited from March 20, 2017, to January 29, 2020. The analysis used a health service perspective and a 90-day time horizon, with supplementary analyses exploring patient benefits up to 1 year. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were undertaken. Data were analyzed from January 13, 2022, to March 10, 2023.

Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive either iRARC (n = 169) or ORC (n = 169).

Main Outcomes And Measures: Costs of surgery were calculated using surgery timings and equipment costs, with other hospital data based on counts of activity. Quality-adjusted life-years were calculated from European Quality of Life 5-Dimension 5-Level instrument responses. Prespecified subgroup analyses were undertaken based on patient characteristics and type of diversion.

Results: A total of 305 patients with available outcome data were included in the analysis, with a mean (SD) age of 68.3 (8.1) years, and of whom 241 (79.0%) were men. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy was associated with statistically significant reductions in admissions to intensive therapy (6.35% [95% CI, 0.42%-12.28%]), and readmissions to hospital (14.56% [95% CI, 5.00%-24.11%]), but increases in theater time (31.35 [95% CI, 13.67-49.02] minutes). The additional cost of iRARC per patient was £1124 (95% CI, -£576 to £2824 [US $1622 (95% CI, -$831 to $4075)]) with an associated gain in quality-adjusted life-years of 0.01124 (95% CI, 0.00391-0.01857). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £100 008 (US $144 312) per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy had a much higher probability of being cost-effective for subgroups defined by age, tumor stage, and performance status.

Conclusions And Relevance: In this economic evaluation of surgery for patients with bladder cancer, iRARC reduced short-term morbidity and some associated costs. While the resulting cost-effectiveness ratio was in excess of thresholds used by many publicly funded health systems, patient subgroups were identified for which iRARC had a high probability of being cost-effective.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03049410.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10314306PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17255DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

radical cystectomy
24
robot-assisted radical
16
bladder cancer
16
patients bladder
12
open radical
8
economic evaluation
8
analyses undertaken
8
quality-adjusted life-years
8
cost-effectiveness ratio
8
radical
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!