AI Article Synopsis

  • This study compares two methods of preserving donor livers for transplantation: traditional static cold storage (SCS) and normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) which keeps the organs at body temperature.
  • The research involved 383 donor livers from various US transplant centers, and while there was no significant difference in early allograft dysfunction rates overall, NMP showed better outcomes for higher-risk donors, particularly in cases of organ donation after circulatory death.
  • The conclusion suggests that while NMP may not lower early liver injury rates universally, it is safe and potentially more beneficial for marginal donor livers.

Article Abstract

Objective: To compare conventional low-temperature storage of transplant donor livers [static cold storage (SCS)] with storage of the organs at physiological body temperature [normothermic machine perfusion (NMP)].

Background: The high success rate of liver transplantation is constrained by the shortage of transplantable organs (eg, waiting list mortality >20% in many centers). NMP maintains the liver in a functioning state to improve preservation quality and enable testing of the organ before transplantation. This is of greatest potential value with organs from brain-dead donor organs (DBD) with risk factors (age and comorbidities), and those from donors declared dead by cardiovascular criteria (donation after circulatory death).

Methods: Three hundred eighty-three donor organs were randomized by 15 US liver transplant centers to undergo NMP (n = 192) or SCS (n = 191). Two hundred sixty-six donor livers proceeded to transplantation (NMP: n = 136; SCS: n = 130). The primary endpoint of the study was "early allograft dysfunction" (EAD), a marker of early posttransplant liver injury and function.

Results: The difference in the incidence of EAD did not achieve significance, with 20.6% (NMP) versus 23.7% (SCS). Using exploratory, "as-treated" rather than "intent-to-treat," subgroup analyses, there was a greater effect size in donation after circulatory death donor livers (22.8% NMP vs 44.6% SCS) and in organs in the highest risk quartile by donor risk (19.2% NMP vs 33.3% SCS). The incidence of acute cardiovascular decompensation at organ reperfusion, "postreperfusion syndrome," as a secondary outcome was reduced in the NMP arm (5.9% vs 14.6%).

Conclusions: NMP did not lower EAD, perhaps related to the inclusion of lower-risk liver donors, as higher-risk donor livers seemed to benefit more. The technology is safe in standard organ recovery and seems to have the greatest benefit for marginal donors.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005934DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

donor livers
20
machine perfusion
8
donor
8
nmp
8
donor organs
8
donation circulatory
8
organs
6
livers
5
liver
5
scs
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!