The first patient was misclassified in the diagnostic conclusion according to a local clinical expert opinion in a new clinical implementation of a knee osteoarthritis artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm at Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. In preparation for the evaluation of the AI algorithm, the implementation team collaborated with internal and external partners to plan workflows, and the algorithm was externally validated. After the misclassification, the team was left wondering: what is an acceptable error rate for a low-risk AI diagnostic algorithm? A survey among employees at the Department of Radiology showed significantly lower acceptable error rates for AI (6.8 %) than humans (11.3 %). A general mistrust of AI could cause the discrepancy in acceptable errors. AI may have the disadvantage of limited social capital and likeability compared to human co-workers, and therefore, less potential for forgiveness. Future AI development and implementation require further investigation of the fear of AI's unknown errors to enhance the trustworthiness of perceiving AI as a co-worker. Benchmark tools, transparency, and explainability are also needed to evaluate AI algorithms in clinical implementations to ensure acceptable performance.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10301708PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20220053DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

acceptable error
12
artificial intelligence
8
lower acceptable
8
error rates
8
acceptable
5
intelligence lower
4
rates humans?
4
humans? patient
4
patient misclassified
4
misclassified diagnostic
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: digitising health worker payments could improve their well-being, that of users of health service points and the performance of the health system. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with the acceptability of mobile payments among health workers in the Koumpentoum health district.

Methods: we conducted a cross-sectional, descriptive and analytical study in the Koumpentoum health district, in eastern Senegal, in January 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Variable power functional dilution adjustment of spot urine.

Sci Rep

January 2025

Praxis Dr.Carmine, Etzelstrasse 21, Pfaeffikon SZ, 8808, Switzerland.

Spot-urinary biomarkers are crucial in medical, epidemiological, and environmental studies, but their variability due to hydration levels requires precise dilution adjustments. Traditional methods, like conventional creatinine correction (CCRC), are limited in compensating for variations in urine concentration, causing substantial inconsistencies, particularly at the extremes of the diuresis spectrum. While restricting the creatinine (CRN) range to 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To develop facial growth prediction models using artificial intelligence (AI) under various conditions, and to compare performance of these models with each other as well as with the partial least squares (PLS) growth prediction model.

Materials And Methods: Longitudinal lateral cephalograms from 33 subjects in the Mathews growth collection were utilized. A total of 1257 pairs of before and after growth lateral cephalograms were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Bayesian deep learning applied to diabetic retinopathy with uncertainty quantification.

Heliyon

January 2025

Information Technology Department, Technical College of Informatics-Akre, Akre University for Applied Sciences, Kurdistan Regain, Iraq.

Deep Learning (DL) has significantly contributed to the field of medical imaging in recent years, leading to advancements in disease diagnosis and treatment. In the case of Diabetic Retinopathy (DR), DL models have shown high efficacy in tasks such as classification, segmentation, detection, and prediction. However, DL model's opacity and complexity lead to errors in decision-making, particularly in complex cases, making it necessary to estimate the model's uncertainty in predictions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The aim of the SURECAN trial is to evaluate a person-centred intervention, based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT Plus ( +)), for people who have completed treatment for cancer with curative intent, but are experiencing poor quality of life. We present the statistical analysis plan for assessing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the intervention in improving quality of life 1 year post randomisation.

Methods And Design: SURECAN is a multi-centre, pragmatic, two-arm, partially clustered randomised controlled superiority trial comparing the effectiveness of ACT + added to usual care with usual aftercare.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!