Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: To construct and validate a nomogram model that integrated deep learning radiomic features based on multiparametric MRI and clinical features for risk stratification of meniscus injury.
Methods: A total of 167 knee MR images were collected from two institutions. All patients were classified into two groups based on the MR diagnostic criteria proposed by Stoller et al. The automatic meniscus segmentation model was constructed through V-net. LASSO regression was performed to extract the optimal features correlated to risk stratification. A nomogram model was constructed by combining the Radscore and clinical features. The performance of the models was evaluated by ROC analysis and calibration curve. Subsequently, the model was simulated by junior doctors in order to test its practical application effect.
Results: The Dice similarity coefficients of automatic meniscus segmentation models were all over 0.8. Eight optimal features, identified by LASSO regression, were employed to calculate the Radscore. The combined model showed a better performance in both the training cohort (AUC = 0.90, 95%CI: 0.84-0.95) and the validation cohort (AUC = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.72-0.93). The calibration curve indicated a better accuracy of the combined model than either the Radscore or clinical model alone. The simulation results showed that the diagnostic accuracy of junior doctors increased from 74.9 to 86.2% after using the model.
Conclusion: Deep learning V-net demonstrated great performance in automatic meniscus segmentation of the knee joint. It was reliable for stratifying the risk of meniscus injury of the knee by nomogram which integrated the Radscores and clinical features.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-05875-x | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!