AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess how effective different treatments for peri-implantitis were by comparing an access flap procedure alone to one that included a xenograft and collagen membrane while providing all patients with systemic antibiotics.
  • Forty participants were divided into two groups and evaluated over 12 months, measuring factors like probing depth, bleeding, and bone levels.
  • Results showed similar improvements in both groups with high patient satisfaction, but no significant differences were found in clinical outcomes between the two treatment methods.

Article Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of reconstructive peri-implantitis treatment.

Materials And Methods: Forty participants, with peri-implantitis and a contained intraosseous defect, were randomized to access flap (control) or access flap with xenograft and collagen membrane (test). All received systemic antimicrobials. Blinded examiners recorded probing depths (PD), bleeding and suppuration on probing (BOP & SOP), soft tissue levels, and marginal bone levels (MBL) at baseline and 12 months. Patient reported outcomes were recorded. The primary outcome was PD change.

Results: All 40 participants (40 implants) completed the 12-month study. The mean (standard deviation) PD reduction (deepest site) was 4.2 (1.8) mm in the control and 3.7 (1.9) mm in the test group. MBL gain (deepest site) was 1.7 (1.6) mm in the control and 2.4 (1.4) mm in the test group. Absence of BOP & SOP was observed at 60% of both control and test implants. Buccal recession was 0.9 (1.6) mm in the control and 0.4 (1.1) mm in the test group. A successful outcome (absence of PD ≥ 5 mm with BOP, absence of SOP and absence of progressive bone loss) was achieved for 90% of the control and 85% of test group implants. No statistically significant differences in clinical or radiographic parameters were found between treatment groups. 30% of participants experienced mild gastro-intestinal disturbances. Reporting followed CONSORT guidelines.

Conclusion: Similar clinical and radiographic improvements at 12 months were observed with high levels of patient satisfaction for both the access flap and xenograft covered by collagen membrane groups. Registered clinical trials.gov. ID:NCT03163602 (23/05/2017).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.14116DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

control test
16
test group
16
access flap
12
flap xenograft
8
collagen membrane
8
bop sop
8
deepest site
8
site control
8
clinical radiographic
8
control
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!