Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
We compare two model approaches for the ray optical description of PV modules with coloring based on an interference layer system on the inside of the cover glass. The light scattering is described by a microfacet-based bidirectional scattering distribution function (BSDF) model on the one hand and ray tracing on the other hand. We show that the microfacet-based BSDF model is largely sufficient for the structures used in the context of the MorphoColor application. A structure inversion shows a significant influence only for extreme angles and very steep structures showing correlated heights and surface normal orientations. Regarding an angle-independent color appearance, the model-based comparison of possible module configurations shows a clear advantage of a structured layer system compared to planar interference layers in combination with a scattering structure on the front side of the glass.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.489221 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!