Background: Simulator training is important for teaching perfusion students fundamental skills associated with CBP before they start working in the clinic. Currently available high-fidelity simulators lack anatomic features that would help students visually understand the connection between hemodynamic parameters and anatomic structure. Therefore, a 3D-printed silicone cardiovascular system was developed at our institution. This study aimed to determine whether using this anatomic perfusion simulator instead of a traditional "bucket" simulator would better improve perfusion students' understanding of cannulation sites, blood flow, and anatomy.

Methods: Sixteen students were tested to establish their baseline knowledge. They were randomly divided into two groups to witness a simulated bypass pump run on one of two simulators - anatomic or bucket - then retested. To better analyze the data, we defined "true learning" as characterized by an incorrect answer on the pre-simulation assessment being corrected on the post-simulation assessment.

Results: The group that witnessed the simulated pump run on the anatomic simulator showed a larger increase in mean test score, more instances of true learning, and a larger gain in the acuity confidence interval.

Conclusions: Despite the small sample size, the results suggest that the anatomic simulator is a valuable instrument for teaching new perfusion students.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10304827PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/ject/2023005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

3d-printed silicone
8
teaching perfusion
8
perfusion students
8
anatomic simulator
8
anatomic
7
simulator
6
silicone anatomic
4
anatomic patient
4
patient simulator
4
simulator enhance
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!