Objective: The aim: To assess the effectiveness and feasibility of laparoscopically assisted TAP block utilization in the system of multimodal analgesia by comparing the severity of pain and associated postoperative recovery indicators in obese patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Patients And Methods: Materials and methods: The retrospective study included 39 patients, who underwent metabolic surgery from 2013-2022. All patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the chosen perioperative analgesia protocol. Group 1 included 19 patients who prior to skin incision a local infiltration of the trocar puncture areas of the abdominal wall. Group 2 included 20 patients, whom in addition to the above-described anaesthesia procedure after completion of the main stage of surgery, a laparoscopically assisted bilateral subcostal TAP block was additionally performed.

Results: Results: The need to use opioid analgesics in the rescue analgesia mode arose in 17.6% (3/17) of patients of the first group, and 5% (1/20) of patients in the second group Average duration of postoperative hospitalization in group 1 was 7.2±1.1 days, and in group 2 it was 6.2±1.4 days (P <0.05).

Conclusion: Conclusions: Subcostal TAP block in obese patients is a safe and effective method of regional anaesthesia. Further study of this option of regional anaesthesia is required in order to be able to form clearer recommendations for its routine use in clinical practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.36740/WLek202305219DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

laparoscopically assisted
12
tap block
12
included patients
12
assisted tap
8
multimodal analgesia
8
patients
8
obese patients
8
metabolic surgery
8
group included
8
group
6

Similar Publications

Long-term durability and temporal pattern of revisional surgery of laparoscopic large hiatal hernia repair.

Updates Surg

January 2025

Department of Surgical Sciences, General Surgery and Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, University of Torino, Corso A.M. Dogliotti 14, 10126, Turin, Italy.

Laparoscopic repair is the preferred surgical treatment for symptomatic Large Hiatal Hernia (LHH). However, data on long-term outcomes are limited. This study aims to evaluate the 20-year follow-up results of laparoscopic LHH repair in a high-volume experienced tertiary center.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Resident level is associated with operative time in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Surg Pract Sci

June 2024

Department of Health Policy and Management, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA, 72205.

Background: While previous literature has shown that resident involvement increases operative time, the influence of resident involvement on operative time is generally not considered in current methods of case time predictions or operating room planning. Furthermore, evidence of prolonged case times based on the level of the assisting resident is yet scarce. We hypothesized that operative time would increase with the post-graduate year of assisting residents as they gain more autonomy in the operating room.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: We investigated the impact of intraoperative tumor capsule injury (TCI) during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) on oncological outcomes, as well as underlying factors of intraoperative TCI for improving surgical outcomes.

Methods: A total of 253 patients who underwent RAPN or LPN between 2010 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed and were divided into two groups: non-TCI and TCI groups. The background was compared between two groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is often performed using hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (HALDN). Adherent perinephric fat (APF) can complicate HALDN, increasing operative time. The Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score predicts APF preoperatively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Comparative study of robotic-assisted vs. laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a single-center experience.

Front Oncol

January 2025

Department of Colorectal Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Tianjin, China.

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) surgeries are commonly performed using either robotic-assisted colorectal surgery (RACS) or laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS). This study aimed to compare clinical and surgical outcomes between RACS and LCS for CRC patients.

Methods: We included 225 patients from Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital (TJMUCH) between January 2021 and June 2024, divided into RACS (n=82) and LCS (n=143) groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!