Autologous Interposition Grafts for Mucosal Flap Septal Perforation Repair.

Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

Published: March 2024

Nasal septal perforation repair is commonly attempted utilizing bilateral nasal mucosal flaps supported with an interposition graft. To compare the failure rates for bilateral flap repairs utilizing four different autologous interposition grafts. This is a retrospective review of a single surgeon's bilateral flap perforation repairs supported with an autologous interposition graft. Study inclusion over the 18-year review period required at least one examination 1 month after surgery. Repair failure rates were calculated and compared for each graft type, and logistic regression was performed for multivariate analysis. For the 356 study patients, median (range) age was 51 years (14-81) and 63.0% were women. Mean (range) perforation length was 13.9 mm (1-45). Median (range) at last follow-up was 11.2 months (1-192). Graft types used (percentage of patients and failure rate) were temporalis fascia (58.7/4.4), septal cartilage (23.3/7.3), auricular perichondrium (13.8/4.1), and septal bone (4.2/6.7) ( > 0.05). There was no significant difference in bilateral mucosal flap perforation repair failure rate when either a temporalis fascia, septal cartilage, auricular perichondrium, or septal bone interposition graft was used.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2022.0179DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

autologous interposition
12
perforation repair
12
interposition graft
12
interposition grafts
8
mucosal flap
8
septal perforation
8
failure rates
8
bilateral flap
8
flap perforation
8
repair failure
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!