Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-09820-9 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Correction: Non-invasive diagnosis of esophageal cancer by a simplified circulating cell-free DNA methylation assay targeting OTOP and KCNA: a double-blinded, multicenter, prospective study.
J Hematol Oncol
December 2024
Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.
Respir Res
December 2024
University of Exeter Medical School, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
To optimize patient outcomes, healthcare decisions should be based on the most up-to-date high-quality evidence. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are vital for demonstrating the efficacy of interventions; however, information on how an intervention compares to already available treatments and/or fits into treatment algorithms is sometimes limited. Although different therapeutic classes are available for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), assessing the relative efficacy of these treatments is challenging.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCorrection: The effect of mesoporous silica doped with silver nanoparticles on glass ionomer cements; physiochemical, mechanical and ion release analysis.
BMC Oral Health
December 2024
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Kuwait University, Safat, P.O. Box 5969, Kwait City, 13060, Kuwait.
Correction: Correlates of intention to screen for cervical cancer among adult women in Kyotera District, Central Uganda: a community based cross-sectional study.
BMC Womens Health
December 2024
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
The analysis and reporting of multiple outcomes in mental health trials: a methodological systematic review.
BMC Med Res Methodol
December 2024
Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK.
Background: The choice of a single primary outcome in randomised trials can be difficult, especially in mental health where interventions may be complex and target several outcomes simultaneously. We carried out a systematic review to assess the quality of the analysis and reporting of multiple outcomes in mental health RCTs, comparing approaches with current CONSORT and other regulatory guidance.
Methods: The review included all late-stage mental health trials published between 1st January 2019 to 31st December 2020 in 9 leading medical and mental health journals.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!