AI Article Synopsis

  • Once-weekly insulin icodec shows potential as a simpler alternative to daily insulin degludec for individuals with type 2 diabetes, which could simplify their treatment regimen.
  • The study was a phase 3a trial involving 588 adults with type 2 diabetes, comparing the efficacy and safety of the two insulin regimens over 26 weeks.
  • Results indicated that both insulins effectively lowered HbA1c levels, with icodec achieving noninferiority and superiority compared to degludec, and no significant differences in hypoglycemic events between the two groups.

Article Abstract

Importance: Once-weekly insulin icodec could provide a simpler dosing alternative to daily basal insulin in people with type 2 diabetes.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-weekly icodec vs once-daily insulin degludec in people with insulin-naive type 2 diabetes.

Design, Setting, And Participants: Randomized, double-masked, noninferiority, treat-to-target, phase 3a trial conducted from March 2021 to June 2022 at 92 sites in 11 countries in adults with type 2 diabetes treated with any noninsulin glucose-lowering agents with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 7%-11% (53-97 mmol/mol).

Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either once-weekly icodec and once-daily placebo (icodec group; n = 294) or once-daily degludec and once-weekly placebo (degludec group; n = 294).

Main Outcomes And Measures: The primary end point was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26 (noninferiority margin, 0.3% percentage points). Secondary end points included change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to week 26, mean weekly insulin dose during the last 2 weeks of treatment, body weight change from baseline to week 26, and number of level 2 (clinically significant; glucose level <54 mg/dL) and level 3 (severe; requiring external assistance for recovery) hypoglycemic episodes.

Results: Among 588 randomized participants (mean [SD] age, 58 [10] years; 219 [37%] women), 564 (96%) completed the trial. Mean HbA1c level decreased from 8.6% (observed) to 7.0% (estimated) at 26 weeks in the icodec group and from 8.5% (observed) to 7.2% (estimated) in the degludec group (estimated treatment difference [ETD], -0.2 [95% CI, -0.3 to -0.1] percentage points), confirming noninferiority (P < .001) and superiority (P = .002). There were no significant differences between the icodec and degludec groups for fasting plasma glucose change from baseline to week 26 (ETD, 0 [95% CI, -6 to 5] mg/dL; P = .90), mean weekly insulin dose during the last 2 weeks of treatment, or body weight change from baseline to week 26 (2.8 kg vs 2.3 kg; ETD, 0.46 [95% CI, -0.19 to 1.10] kg; P = .17). Combined level 2 or 3 hypoglycemia rates were numerically higher in the icodec group than the degludec group from week 0 to 31 (0.31 vs 0.15 events per patient-year exposure; P = .11) and statistically higher in the icodec group from week 0 to 26 (0.35 vs 0.12 events per patient-year exposure; P = .01).

Conclusions And Relevance: Among people with insulin-naive type 2 diabetes, once-weekly icodec demonstrated superior HbA1c reduction to once-daily degludec after 26 weeks of treatment, with no difference in weight change and a higher rate of combined level 2 or 3 hypoglycemic events in the context of less than 1 event per patient-year exposure in both groups.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04795531.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10354685PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.11313DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

icodec once-daily
12
baseline week
12
once-weekly insulin
8
insulin icodec
8
once-daily insulin
8
insulin degludec
8
insulin-naive type
8
type diabetes
8
once-weekly icodec
8
once-weekly
5

Similar Publications

Introduction: ONWARDS 5 evaluated the effectiveness and safety of insulin icodec (icodec) titrated with a dosing guide app (icodec with app) versus once-daily insulin analogs in insulin-naive adults with type 2 diabetes. The insulin glargine U300 (glargine U300) stratum was too small to enable a robust post hoc efficacy comparison. Augmentation methodology was applied to increase the glargine U300 group size using real-world data (RWD), to facilitate efficacy comparisons of icodec with app versus glargine U300, and to demonstrate the potential of the augmentation methodology to strengthen underpowered treatment comparisons (AUGMENT study).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Insulin icodec is a basal insulin designed for once-weekly administration. This study assessed the pharmacological properties of icodec in Japanese individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Materials And Methods: In a randomized, open-label, crossover study, 24 Japanese individuals with T1D (20-64 years; glycated hemoglobin ≤9.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Efficacy and Hypoglycemia Rate When Switching From Once-Daily Basal Insulin to Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec Without or With a One-Time Additional Dose in Insulin-Experienced Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes.

Endocr Pract

December 2024

Center for Clinical Metabolic Research, Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hellerup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.

Objective: Insulin icodec (icodec), a once-weekly basal insulin analog, has been investigated in the phase 3a ONWARDS clinical trial program. This pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) modeling analysis of data from the ONWARDS 2 and 4 trials investigated efficacy outcomes and hypoglycemia rate in insulin-experienced individuals with type 2 diabetes when switching from daily basal insulin to icodec without or with a 50% one-time additional dose for the first injection only.

Methods: Data from 2 randomized, 26-week, phase 3a trials of insulin-experienced individuals with type 2 diabetes on a basal (ONWARDS 2) or basal-bolus (ONWARDS 4) insulin regimen were used for PK/PD model development and validation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: This meta-analysis was performed to obtain a comprehensive overview of the differences between once-weekly basal insulin (including icodec and basal insulin Fc) and once-daily basal insulin (including glargine and degludec) in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for eligible studies up to 2 January 2024.

Results: A total of 12 studies were included, comprising 5,895 patients, with 3,104 (52.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Icodec, once-weekly basal insulin, aims to simplify therapy management by reducing injection frequency for diabetic patients. The efficacy and safety of icodec were evaluated in the ONWARDS clinical development program. This study evaluates icodec economic and quality of life impact from the Italian National Healthcare System (NHS) perspective.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!