Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Malalignment is often postulated as an important reason for the high failure rate of total ankle replacements (TARs). The correlation between TAR malalignment and clinical outcome, however, is not fully understood. Improving and expanding radiographic TAR alignment measurements in the clinic might lead to a better insight into the correlation between malalignment and the clinical outcome. This study aims to develop and validate a tool to semi-automatic measure TAR alignment, and to improve alignment measurements on radiographs in the clinic.
Methods: A tool to semi-automatically measure TAR alignment on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs was developed in MATLAB. Using the principle of edge contouring and the perpendicular relationship between the anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, the exact configuration of the TAR components can be found. Two observers validated the tool by measuring TAR alignment of ten patients using the tool. The Intraclass Coefficient (ICC) was calculated to assess the reliability of the developed method. The results obtained by the tool were compared to clinical results during radiographic follow-up in the past, and the accuracy of both methods was calculated using three-dimensional CT data.
Results: The tool showed an accuracy of 76% compared to 71% for the method used during follow-up. ICC values were 0.94 (p < 0.01) and higher for both inter-and intra-observer reliability.
Conclusions: The tool presents a reproducible method to measure TAR alignment parameters. Three-dimensional alignment parameters are obtained from two-dimensional radiographs, and as the tool can be applied to most TAR designs, it offers a valuable addition in the clinic and for research purposes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10290371 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13047-023-00640-0 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!