Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of 30-day mortality after metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS). Multiple predictive tools exist for VTE risk assessment and extended VTE chemoprophylaxis determination.

Objective: To review existing risk-stratification tools and compare their predictive abilities.

Setting: MBSAQIP database.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database was performed (2015-2019) for primary minimally invasive MBS cases. VTE clinical factors and risk-assessment tools were evaluated: body mass index threshold of 50 kg/m, Caprini risk-assessment model, and 3 bariatric-specific tools: the Cleveland Clinic VTE risk tool, the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative tool, and BariClot. MBS patients were deemed high risk based on criteria from each tool and further assessed for sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value.

Results: Overall, 709,304 patients were identified with a .37% VTE rate. Bariatric-specific tools included multiple predictors: procedure, age, race, gender, operative time, length of stay, heart failure, and dyspnea at rest; operative time was the only variable common to all. The body mass index cutoff and Caprini risk-assessment model had higher sensitivity but lower specificity when compared with the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative and BariClot tools. While the sensitivity of the tools varied widely and was overall low, the Cleveland Clinic tool had the highest sensitivity. The bariatric-specific tools would have recommended extended prophylaxis for 1.1%-15.6% of patients.

Conclusions: Existing MBS VTE risk-assessment tools differ widely for inclusion variables, high-risk definition, and predictive performance. Further research and registry inclusion of all significant risk factors are needed to determine the optimal risk-stratified approach for predicting VTE events and determining the need for extended prophylaxis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2023.04.329DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bariatric surgery
20
bariatric-specific tools
12
tools
10
venous thromboembolism
8
existing risk-stratification
8
risk-stratification tools
8
vte
8
metabolic bariatric
8
vte risk
8
risk-assessment tools
8

Similar Publications

Outcomes and complications after long versus short gastric pouch Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with severe obesity.

Sci Rep

December 2024

Department of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Hazrat-E Fatemeh Hospital, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the second most common metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) globally. The impact of pouch size on weight loss outcomes and complications remains unclear. This study aims to compare the weight loss outcomes and complications in long pouch versus short pouch RYGB in patients with severe obesity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Same-day discharge after sleeve gastrectomy (SDDSG) is being performed in select patient populations with increased regularity since 2020.

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of SDDSG on emergency department (ED) visits.

Setting: Academic and private practice bariatric surgery programs participating in a statewide quality improvement collaborative.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!