Sex-based disparities in outcomes are reported for various cardiovascular procedures. This study aimed to assess the difference in outcomes in patients who underwent WATCHMAN device implant based on sex. Patients who underwent WATCHMAN device placement, from 2016 to 2018, were identified from the National Inpatient Sample database. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality, and the secondary outcomes were the length of stay (LOS), hospitalization cost (HOC), and periprocedural complications. A logistic regression model was built to perform an adjusted analysis for the outcomes. A total of 12,327 patients underwent WATCHMAN device placement. Female patients were older and more likely to have hypertension (p <0.01) and less likely to have peripheral arterial disease (5.6 vs 7.2, p <0.01), chronic kidney disease (21% vs 26%, p <0.01), and diabetes (18% vs 20%, p = 0.03) and were also at a higher risk for certain periprocedural complications, including pericardiocentesis and anemia requiring blood transfusion (p <0.01 for all). In the unadjusted analysis, the female sex was associated with longer LOS (1.5 vs 1.3 days, p <0.01) and inpatient mortality (0.23 vs 0.10, p = 0.05). The HOC was numerically higher in women but statistically nonsignificant ($120,791 vs $118,554, p = 0.1). In the stepwise, backward, multivariate regression analysis, the female sex  was an independent risk factor for higher LOS (1.5 vs 1.3 days, p <0.01, 95% confidence interval 1.3 to 1.4) after adjusting for potential confounders. The inpatient mortality and HOC were similar between 2 groups after adjusting for potential cofounders in the multivariate regression analysis. Our study suggests that the female sex is an independent risk factor for longer LOS among patients hospitalized for WATCHMAN device placement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.05.037DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

watchman device
16
patients underwent
12
underwent watchman
12
outcomes patients
8
device placement
8
patients
5
sex-based outcomes
4
patients undergoing
4
watchman
4
undergoing watchman
4

Similar Publications

Background: Historically, percutaneous transcatheter left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has been performed under general anesthesia (GA) with transesophageal echocardiographic images obtained by a noninvasive cardiologist and usually requires an overnight hospital stay. Alternatively, we present our single-center experience performing LAACs under deep sedation (DS), employing an echocardiographic technician instead of a noninvasive cardiologist, and expediting same-day discharge. Mid- to long-term outcomes were also evaluated with follow-up imaging at a 45-day visit.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

WATCHMAN versus LACbes® device for percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: a single-center, propensity-matched study.

BMC Cardiovasc Disord

January 2025

Department of Cardiology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, No. 168 Changhai Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, China.

Background: Different left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) devices have been introduced into the clinical setting. A new dual-seal mechanism LACbes® occluder with isogenous barbs for LAAC has been designed to facilitate easier delivery and improve safety. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of the WATCHMAN with those of the LACbes® device for LAAC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an alternative for patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) to avoid oral anticoagulants, but issues like incomplete device endothelialization (IDE) can lead to complications.
  • A study compared the endothelialization rates after implantation of two devices: the Watchman plug and the LACBES occluder, in 201 patients, using cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA).
  • Results showed that the LACBES occluder had a higher IDE rate at both 3 and 6 months compared to the Watchman device, indicating that it takes longer for the LACBES to achieve complete endothelialization after LAAC.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Cardiac computed tomography imaging with contrast is being used increasingly to image left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices. Contrast flow across a device, also known as a transfabric leak (TFL), may indicate a lack of complete LAAO-device endothelialization. The data on the rate, predictors, and clinical events associated with TFL are limited.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Pseudo Peridevice Leak After LAA Closure Device Implantation Unmasking a Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava.

JACC Clin Electrophysiol

November 2024

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, LaCrosse, Wisconsin, USA. Electronic address:

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!