Purpose: This study aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes and patient-surveyed scar assessments of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SPLA) with the outcomes of multiport laparoscopic appendectomy (MPLA).
Methods: Between August 2014 and November 2017, the prospective randomized study comprised 98 patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis and indicated for surgery. Fifty-one patients had MPLA and 47 patients received SPLA. The primary endpoint was the total score of Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire (PSAQ) administered to patients 6 weeks after surgery.
Results: SPLA involved a shorter median operative time than MPLA (47.5 minutes vs. 60.0 minutes, = 0.02). There were no apparent differences in the time before diet tolerance, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complication. SPLA patients had shorter total incision length (2.0 cm vs. 2.5 cm, < 0.01) and required fewer analgesics on the day of surgery than MPLA patients ( = 0.011). The PSAQ favored the SPLA approach, revealing significant differences in total score (48 vs. 55, = 0.026), appearance (15 vs. 18, = 0.002), and consciousness (8 vs. 10, = 0.005), while satisfaction with appearance and symptoms scale did not ( = 0.162 and = 0.690, respectively).
Conclusion: The postoperative scar evaluated by the patient was better with SPLA than with MPLA, and patient satisfaction with the scar was comparable between the two techniques.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10280108 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2023.26.2.55 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Safety and cost of selective histopathological analysis for detecting cancer in surgical specimens: a systematic review.
ANZ J Surg
January 2025
Department of Surgery, The Univeristy of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Background: Due to limited healthcare resources, there is global incentive to maximize efficacy while minimizing patient harm. Given the low rate of cancer diagnoses made via routine histopathological analysis of surgical specimens, a selective approach has been proposed as a viable alternative. This systematic review aimed to evaluate effectiveness of cancer detection and costs with a selective approach.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSynchronous Acute Appendicitis and Cholecystitis.
CRSLS
January 2025
Department of Surgery, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. (Drs. Aljunaydil, Mattar, Almufawaz, AlOthman, and Alalem).
Introduction: Acute appendicitis and acute cholecystitis are two of the most commonly encountered surgical entities. Multiple hypotheses are behind their coexistence, which include pathogen predilection, and mucosal ischemia inducing portal vein bacteremia as the management of uncomplicated acute cholecystitis and acute appendicitis is surgical, for which a single operation for synchronous presentation is effective. Here, we report a case with coexistent acute cholecystitis and acute appendicitis managed at our institution.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFShould an Interval Appendicectomy Be Performed by a Minimally Invasive Gynaecologist?
Int J Womens Health
December 2024
Sydney Women's Endosurgery Centre (SWEC), St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Objective: We aimed to explore the abnormal pathology findings in appendix specimens removed based on intraoperative abnormal appearance during elective surgery for benign gynaecological conditions by a minimally invasive gynaecologist, as well as the associated complication rate.
Materials And Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary referral surgical centre for benign gynaecological conditions between the years 2004-2023. It included patients who underwent appendicectomy by a trained minimally invasive gynaecologist based on observations during surgery for benign gynaecological conditions.
Beyond the Usual Suspects: Appendiceal Bleeding as the Surprising Cause of Lower Gastrointestinal (GI) Bleeding.
Cureus
December 2024
Department of Surgery, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, GBR.
Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is a common clinical condition typically associated with diseases like diverticular disease, inflammatory bowel disease, and cancer. However, rarer etiologies such as appendiceal hemorrhage can present similarly, complicating diagnosis and management. This case report discusses a 42-year-old male who presented with severe rectal bleeding.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe Role of Group and Save Testing Prior to Emergency Laparoscopic Appendicectomy.
Cureus
December 2024
General Surgery, United Lincolnshire Hospitals Trust, Lincoln, GBR.
The routine use of preoperative group and save (G&S) blood tests in emergency laparoscopic appendicectomies has been a standard yet often unquestioned practice. However, with the advancements in laparoscopic techniques and the low risk of intraoperative bleeding, is this precaution necessary? Analysing 276 emergency appendicectomy cases over a year, our study revealed that no transfusions were required due to surgical complications. Nevertheless, routine G&S testing causes considerable financial and resource strains, consuming valuable time and delaying treatment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!